Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
History
Mr. Punch's History of Modern England, Vol. 3 (of 4).—1874-1892
Graves, Charles L. (Charles Larcom)
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Humor
A bold, original, impudent lot are these New Englanders, but they are
notwithstanding wonderfully refreshing. Sometimes their spirits are
too much for their strength, and they come tremendous "croppers." It
has been well said that a strikingly original writer occasionally
writes absolute nonsense, and by the same rule an artist, who turns
aside from the well-swept, carefully watered, mathematically paved
academic high road, must not infrequently paint absolute nonsense; but
he thinks for himself, he does not view Nature through the spectacles
of others, and in nine cases out of ten he is likely to produce
works that will be successful in the long run. Though there are some
pictures among the collection will make the casual visitor jump, there
are not a few will make him think.
Some of the rebels of 1889 have developed into the academics of thirty
years later, and _Punch's_ list of the most notable contributors
makes us jump as well as think: John S. Sargent, Solomon J. Solomon,
Whistler, B. Sickert, Tuke, Edward Stott, A. Roche, N. Garstin, G.
Roussell, Sidney Starr, F. Brown, A. Mann, H. Vos, W. J. Laidlaw and J.
E. Christie.
_Punch_, then, cannot be written down as a Philistine, but there is no
denying the fact that his artistic judgment was warped and impaired by
his invincible hostility to the æsthetic movement; his inability to
disentangle the good in it from the evil; his confusion of charlatanry
and sincerity; and his failure to recognize the great services rendered
by Morris in the domain of decorative design. Prejudice and ignorance
mingle with good sense and good feeling in the manifesto which _Punch_
put forth in 1882, and which may serve as a general exposition of his
artistic and literary creed in the 'eighties:--
IN EARNEST
Let us be clearly understood. The word "Æstheticism" has been
perverted from its original meaning; i.e. the perception of all
that is good, pure and beautiful in Nature and in Art, and, as now
vulgarly applied, it has come in a slang sort of way to stand for
an effeminate, invertebrate, sensuous, sentimentally-Christian, but
thoroughly Pagan taste in literature and art, which delights in the
idea of the resuscitation of the Great God Pan, in Swinburnian songs
at their highest fever-pitch, in the mystic ravings of a Blake, the
affectation of a Rossetti, the _Charmides_ and revoltingly pantheistic
_Rosa Mystica_ of Oscar Wilde, the Songs of Passion and Pain and
other similar mock-hysterical imitations of the "Mighty Masters."
Victor Hugo, Ouida, Swinburne, Burne-Jones, have much to answer for.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account