Actresses -- Great Britain -- Biography; Siddons, Sarah, 1755-1831
“Have you ever heard,” asked Garrick, in an unpublished letter to Moody,
then at Liverpool, “of a woman Siddons, who is strolling about somewhere
near you?” Four months later, by the help of the Rev. Henry Bate’s
favourable report of her powers, she made her first appearance at Drury
Lane. The Golden Gates of the Temple of Fame were thrown open. The young
priestess had but to enter, one would have thought, and light the sacred
flame; but genius is not to be bound by expediency or opportunity.
It was in 1775, the year when Garrick gave up the management, that Mrs.
Siddons appeared on the boards of Drury Lane. She had reached the highest
point of her ambition—she was to act with the greatest actor of his time
before a dramatic audience rendered fastidious and critical by great
traditions.
This is the most unfortunate portion of her life to recount. Failure
and disappointment attended every step she made; and this failure and
disappointment, although it did not in the least discourage her in the
prosecution of her art, hurried her into bitterness and an unjust feeling
of rancour against Garrick, which an examination of the circumstances of
the case in no way warrants. One of the Kemble weaknesses was a proud
sensitiveness to anything like slight or neglect, and these slights were
as often as not phantoms of their own imaginations.
It gives one a mournful sense of injustice to see the charge of jealousy
she openly brings repeated by the earlier biographer who wrote about
her—when we, who have fuller light thrown upon the great actor’s life
by the publication of his correspondence, know how free he was from the
besetting sins of his craft. To be popular, a man must have the faults
of those among whom he is placed. Garrick was called stingy because he
did not throw away his money like his colleagues; stiff, because he was a
moral man amidst a laxity of manners that has become proverbial; jealous,
because he placed the honour of his art and his theatre above personal
considerations. He was an object of envy because of his unparalleled
success. The two clouds which veiled the nobility of his character—love
of money and love of fine friends—vanished like mists in the sunshine if
he were really called upon to help a case of distress or take notice of
an old friend. These faults were harped upon, however, by Johnson, Foote,
and hosts of others. Well might Garrick, in the evening of his days,
sitting on the terrace of his house at Twickenham, make the, for him,
bitter observation, “I have not always met gratitude in a play-house.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account