Munsey's Magazine, Vol. VI, No. 1, October 1891 — John Shaqi
Munsey's Magazine, Vol. VI, No. 1, October 1891Various
History
Munsey's Magazine, Vol. VI, No. 1, October 1891
Various
American periodicals
In many minds millions breed envy, and it is only natural that while
William H. Vanderbilt’s wonderful ability has been universally
recognized, his personal qualities should have been misrepresented. Four
hasty and injudicious words of his seem to have made a deeper impression
upon the public mind than his many notable acts of generosity and public
spirit. The circumstances under which that famous epigram, “the public be
d——d!” was uttered, are thus narrated by Henry Clews, in his interesting
volume of reminiscences, which has also been the authority for other
facts cited in this article:
The subject [of Mr. Vanderbilt’s interview with a Chicago
newspaper reporter] was the fast mail train to Chicago. Mr.
Vanderbilt was thinking of taking this train off because it did
not pay.
“Why are you going to stop this fast mail train?” asked the
reporter.
“Because it doesn’t pay,” replied Mr. Vanderbilt; “I can’t run
a train as far as this permanently at a loss.”
“But the public find it very convenient and useful. You ought
to accommodate them,” rejoined the reporter.
“The public!” said Mr. Vanderbilt. “How do you know, or how
can I know, that they want it? If they want it, why don’t they
patronize it and make it pay? That’s the only test I have as to
whether a thing is wanted or not. Does it pay? If it doesn’t
pay I suppose it isn’t wanted.”
“Are you working,” persisted the reporter, “for the public or
for your stockholders?”
“The public be damned!” exclaimed Mr. Vanderbilt. “I am working
for my stockholders. If the public want the train why don’t
they support it?”
The expression, when placed in its real connection in the
interview, does not imply any slur upon the public. It simply
intimates that he was urging a thing on the public which it did
not want and practically refused. The “cuss” word might have
been left out, but the crushing reply to the reporter would not
have been so emphatic, and that obtrusive representative of
public opinion might have gone away unsquelched.
William H. Vanderbilt never sought notoriety for his acts of munificence,
but they were neither few nor small. He voluntarily paid to his brother
Cornelius an annuity five times as large as that named by his father’s
will. He presented each of his sisters with half a million in United
States bonds. He added $300,000 to the million given by the Commodore to
the Vanderbilt University at Nashville, Tennessee. He bore the expense
of bringing the obelisk that now stands in Central Park from Alexandria
to New York—which cost over $100,000. He gave $500,000 to the College
of Physicians and Surgeons. His will distributed another million among
various charities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account