Communism -- Soviet Union; Goldman, Emma, 1869-1940; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921 -- Personal narratives, American
The “new economic policy” came as a surprise and a shock to most
Communists. They saw in it a reversal of everything that their Party
had been proclaiming--a reversal of Communism itself. In protest some of
the oldest members of the Party, men who had faced danger and
persecution under the old régime while Lenin and Trotsky lived abroad in
safety, left the Communist Party embittered and disappointed. The
leaders then declared a lockout. They ordered the clearing of the Party
ranks of all “doubtful” elements. Everybody suspected of an independent
attitude and those who did not accept the new economic policy as the
last word in revolutionary wisdom were expelled. Among them were
Communists who for years had rendered most devoted service. Some of
them, hurt to the quick by the unjust and brutal procedure, and shaken
to their depths by the collapse of what they held most high, even
resorted to suicide. But the smooth sailing of Lenin’s new gospel had to
be assured, the gospel of the sanctity of private property and the
freedom of cutthroat competition erected upon the ruins of four years of
revolution.
However, Communist indignation over the new economic policy merely
indicated the confusion of mind on the part of Lenin’s opponents. What
else but mental confusion could approve of the numerous acrobatic
political stunts of Lenin and yet grow indignant at the final
somersault, its logical culmination? The trouble with the devout
Communists was that they clung to the Immaculate Conception of the
Communist State which by the aid of the Revolution was to redeem the
world. But most of the leading Communists never entertained such a
delusion. Least of all Lenin.
During my first interview I received the impression that he was a shrewd
politician who knew exactly what he was about and that he would stop at
nothing to achieve his ends. After hearing him speak on several
occasions and reading his works I became convinced that Lenin had very
little concern in the Revolution and that Communism to him was a very
remote thing. The centralized political State was Lenin’s deity, to
which everything else was to be sacrificed. Someone said that Lenin
would sacrifice the Revolution to save Russia. Lenin’s policies,
however, have proven that he was willing to sacrifice both the
Revolution and the country; or at least part of the latter, in order to
realize his political scheme with what was left of Russia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account