Communism -- Soviet Union; Goldman, Emma, 1869-1940; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921 -- Personal narratives, American
Lenin was the most pliable politician in history. He could be an
ultra-revolutionary, a compromiser and conservative at the same time.
When like a mighty wave the cry swept over Russia, “All power to the
Soviets!” Lenin swam with the tide. When the peasants took possession of
the land and the workers of the factories, Lenin not only approved of
those direct methods but went further. He issued the famous motto, “Rob
the robbers,” a slogan which served to confuse the minds of the people
and caused untold injury to revolutionary idealism. Never before did any
real revolutionist interpret social expropriation as the transfer of
wealth from one set of individuals to another. Yet that was exactly what
Lenin’s slogan meant. The indiscriminate and irresponsible raids, the
accumulation of the wealth of the former bourgeoisie by the new Soviet
bureaucracy, the chicanery practised toward those whose only crime was
their former status, were all the results of Lenin’s “Rob the robbers”
policy. The whole subsequent history of the Revolution is a kaleidoscope
of Lenin’s compromises and betrayal of his own slogans.
Bolshevik acts and methods since the October days may seem to contradict
the new economic policy. But in reality they are links in the chain
which was to forge the all-powerful, centralized Government with State
Capitalism as its economic expression. Lenin possessed clarity of vision
and an iron will. He knew how to make his comrades in Russia and outside
of it believe that his scheme was true Socialism and his methods the
revolution. No wonder that Lenin felt such contempt for his flock, which
he never hesitated to fling into their faces. “Only fools can believe
that Communism is possible in Russia now,” was Lenin’s reply to the
opponents of the new economic policy.
As a matter of fact, Lenin was right. True Communism was never attempted
in Russia, unless one considers thirty-three categories of pay,
different food rations, privileges to some and indifference to the great
mass as Communism.
In the early period of the Revolution it was comparatively easy for the
Communist Party to possess itself of power. All the revolutionary
elements, carried away by the ultra-revolutionary promises of the
Bolsheviki, helped the latter to power. Once in possession of the State
the Communists began their process of elimination. All the political
parties and groups which refused to submit to the new dictatorship had
to go. First the Anarchists and Left Social Revolutionists, then the
Mensheviki and other opponents from the Right, and finally everybody who
dared aspire to an opinion of his own. Similar was the fate of all
independent organizations. They were either subordinated to the needs of
the new State or destroyed altogether, as were the Soviets, the trade
unions and the coöperatives--three great factors for the realization of
the hopes of the Revolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account