My Life at Sea: being a "yarn" loosely spun for the purpose of holding together certain reminiscences of the transition period from sail to steam in the British mercantile marine (1863-1894) — John Shaqi
My Life at Sea: being a "yarn" loosely spun for the purpose of holding together certain reminiscences of the transition period from sail to steam in the British mercantile marine (1863-1894)Crutchley, William Caius
History
My Life at Sea: being a "yarn" loosely spun for the purpose of holding together certain reminiscences of the transition period from sail to steam in the British mercantile marine (1863-1894)
Crutchley, William Caius
Merchant marine -- Great Britain; Seafaring life
I wish I dare set down in black and white the various incidents of that
trip, but I must refrain. We had three passengers, an old Cornishman
and his wife, considered second class, who lived in a boarded space
in the poop, and a fairly young lady who messed with the captain and
mate. The front of the poop was fitted up as an immense birdcage
for a great number of small green parrots that at one period of the
voyage died by scores daily. I believe, however, that enough survived
to make the venture a paying one to the skipper. We had shipped as
steward a colonial man, the blackest I ever saw, with an immense idea
of his own importance. As the steward on a sailing-ship is looked upon
exclusively as the master’s servant there is frequently antagonism
shown him by the mate, and the present case was no exception to the
rule.
Now let me say that so far as my knowledge serves me, all boys at
sea are thieves so far as food is concerned. It is not considered
dishonourable to steal any food that can be got at, but the great crime
is to be found out. My particular chum, Fred Wilkes, however, not
content with annexing potatoes, had the audacity to light the galley
fire in the middle watch for the purpose of baking them. This was
asking for trouble, which promptly arrived, for, being taken red-handed
in the act, he was sentenced to be deprived of his forenoon watch below
for an indefinite time, and this sentence of brutality was actually
carried out. For the uninitiated it may be explained that, having been
on deck for eight hours previous to 8 a.m., he was allowed time for his
breakfast and then called on deck to begin a full day’s work.
The passage home was to be made round the Cape of Good Hope (few of the
Adelaide ships favoured the Cape Horn route), and we were particularly
fortunate in getting round Cape Leeuwin and up into the south-east
trades with a fine fair wind. There are few more pleasant passages than
that across the Indian Ocean at the southern limit of the south-east
trade, which on this occasion was blowing very strongly. Indeed, at
times it was more than we could carry all studding sails to. I remember
that in our middle watch the lower stunsail had been taken in for
wind, and the captain, coming on deck during a period of lull, soundly
abused the second mate, in whose watch I was, for keeping the ship
“hove-to,” and that with everything set except one lower stunsail which
was even then being got ready to hoist again. King was not in favour
with the powers that were, although to do him justice he was a very
fine seaman. On one occasion on the passage from Auckland to Adelaide
it became necessary to call all hands to shorten sail, and it happened
that King was in charge, neither the mate nor captain being on deck. It
was necessary to take in the mainsail, and he did it successfully by
taking up the lee side first, in opposition to the dictum laid down in
Falconer’s _Shipwreck_ that--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account