My Queen: A Weekly Journal for Young Women. Issue 3, October 13, 1900: Marion Marlowe's True Heart; or, How a Daughter Forgave — John Shaqi
My Queen: A Weekly Journal for Young Women. Issue 3, October 13, 1900: Marion Marlowe's True Heart; or, How a Daughter ForgaveSheldon, Lurana
General
My Queen: A Weekly Journal for Young Women. Issue 3, October 13, 1900: Marion Marlowe's True Heart; or, How a Daughter Forgave
Sheldon, Lurana
Dime novels -- Periodicals; Popular literature -- Periodicals; Young women -- Periodicals
We are very sorry indeed to learn of this trait in your betrothed. It
shows a bad disposition to dislike animals, yet it does not always
follow that a man will be unkind to a woman because of that trait in
his disposition. Personally I would not have a man about who was unkind
to animals, and I am inclined to think that such a man would be apt
to make almost any woman unhappy. The poor animals suffer enough, and
there is no one to protect them but ourselves. If we neglect this duty
it seems to me that we are culpable and deserve, even if we do not
receive, some severe form of punishment. We do not blame you at all
for feeling as you do, and advise you to try and reform your lover, if
possible.
“Please answer this question and oblige a constant reader: Is it
proper to allow a young man to put his arm around you when you are
riding in the surface cars or elevated, or when you are coming home
from Coney Island on the boat. I have allowed my escort to do so
several times, and some of my girl friends say that it looks very
silly. I am in love with this young man and he is in love with me. Is
there any harm in our showing our affection?
“Laura.”
The habit of hugging in public is certainly very bad taste, and we
agree with your friends that it also looks silly. In the first place,
unless the young man is engaged to you he has no right to embrace
you at all, and you would be much more modest and ladylike if you
refused to allow him such privileges in public. Embraces are but the
demonstrations of holy affection. They should not be paraded before the
eyes of the public.
“Do you think it is wrong for a married woman to engage in business?
I have a desirable situation offered me, and am tempted to accept it,
but my husband objects so decidedly that I have doubted the propriety
of my idea of working. My husband seems to feel that I have no right
to work, and says that he will not live with me if I do.
“We have no children and I would be glad of the occupation. Please
let me have your advice on the matter.
“Mrs. Ella W.”
We see no harm in your engaging in business with your husband’s
consent, but if he does not wish it and can provide well for you
without, we should certainly advise you to yield to his wishes. Married
women can discover many home occupations and amusements, and in other
ways develop their minds and talents. There is no necessity for home
life becoming monotonous. The question of propriety does not enter into
the subject. Consider your husband’s wishes because you love him and do
not disagree with him unless it is a matter of principle. What did you
marry him for if you wanted to go into business? If he had desired a
business woman for a wife he would probably have married one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account