My Wife and I; Or, Harry Henderson's HistoryStowe, Harriet Beecher
General
My Wife and I; Or, Harry Henderson's History
Stowe, Harriet Beecher
American fiction -- 19th century; Courtship -- Fiction; Marriage -- Fiction; Romance fiction
"Well, the fact is," said my uncle, "Caroline _is_ a splendid nurse; she
has great physical strength and endurance, great courage and presence of
mind, and a wonderful power of consoling and comforting sick people. She
has borrowed some of my books, and seemed to show a considerable
acuteness in her remarks on them. But somehow the idea that a lovely
young woman should devote herself to medicine, has seemed to me a great
waste, and I never seriously encouraged it."
"Depend upon it," said I, "Caroline is a woman who will become more
charming in proportion as she moves more thoroughly and perfectly in the
sphere for which nature has adapted her. Keep a great, stately, white
swan shut up in a barn-yard and she has an ungainly gait, becomes
morose, and loses her beautiful feathers; but set her free to glide off
into her native element and all is harmonious and beautiful. A superior
woman, gifted with personal attractions, who is forgetting herself in
the enthusiasm of some high calling or profession, never becomes an old
maid; she does not wither; she advances as life goes on, and often keeps
her charms longer than the matron exhausted by family cares and
motherhood. A charming woman, fully and happily settled and employed in
a life-work which is all in all to her, is far more likely to be
attractive and to be sought than one who enters the ranks of the
fashionable waiters on Providence."
"Well, well," said my uncle, "I'll think of it. The fact is, we fellows
of three-score ought to be knocked on the head peaceably. We have the
bother of being progressive all through our youth, and by the time we
get something settled, up comes your next generation and begins kicking
it all over. It's too bad to demolish the house we spend our youth in
building just when we want rest, and don't want the fatigue of building
over."
"For that matter," said I, "the modern ideas of woman's sphere were all
thought out and expressed in the Greek mythology ages and ages ago. The
Greeks didn't fit every woman to one type. There was their pretty, plump
little Aphrodite, and their godlike Venus de Milo; there was Diana--the
woman of cold, bright, pure physical organization,--independent, free,
vigorous. There was Minerva, the impersonation of the purely
intellectual woman, who neither wished nor sought marriage. There was
Juno, the house-keeper and domestic queen, and Ceres, the bread-giver
and provider. In short, the Greeks conceived a variety of spheres of
womanhood; but we, in modern times, have reduced all to one--the vine
that twines, and the violet hid in the leaves; as if the Victoria Regia
hadn't as good a right to grow as the daisy, and as if there were not
female oaks and pines as well as male!"
"Well, after all," he said, "the prevalent type of sex through nature,
is that of strength for man and dependence for woman."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account