Detective and mystery stories; England -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
“The next point that struck me—I called your attention to it—was the
nature of the marks: the sharp edge. There's no doubt in my mind that
some strip of cloth was used in tying him up. Now, one doesn't find
strips of cloth on the spur of the moment. A handkerchief would answer
the purpose; but here you had each leg tied to the chair and a fetter
on the wrists as well. Unless there were three people in the attack,
they'd only be able to rake up two handkerchiefs on the spur of the
moment, since most people normally content themselves with a
handkerchief apiece. Strips torn off a bed-sheet might answer; but I
can't quite see Peter Hay standing idly by while they tore up his
sheets in order to tie him up later on. Besides, his bedclothes were
intact, so far as I could see—and he doesn't use sheets.”
“I see what you're driving at, Clinton,” Wendover interrupted. “You
want to make out that it was a premeditated affair. They brought the
apparatus in their pockets ready for use, and didn't tie the old man
up on the spur of the moment with the first thing that came handy?”
“Things seem to point that way, don't they?” Sir Clinton continued.
“Then there's the question of how it was done. I agree with you,
inspector, that it was a job for more than one man. Quite evidently
they had force enough to pin Peter Hay almost instantaneously, so that
he hadn't a chance of struggling; and it would take two men—and fairly
powerful fellows—to do that successfully. Also, if there were two of
them, one could hold him in talk whilst the other sauntered
round—perhaps to look at the squirrel—and got into position to take
him unawares from the rear.”
Armadale's face showed a certain satisfaction at finding the chief
constable in agreement with him on his point.
“Now we'll assume that they had him overpowered. If it was a case of
simple robbery, the easiest thing to do would be to tie his hands
together and fetter his ankles, and then leave him on the floor while
they looted the place. But they tied him in a chair—which isn't so
easy to do, after all. They must have had some reason for that, or
they wouldn't have gone to the extra trouble.”
“Even if you tie a man's hands and feet, he can always roll over and
over and make himself a nuisance,” the inspector suggested. “If you
tie him in a chair you have him fast.”
“Quite true,” Sir Clinton admitted. “But would you go to the extra
trouble yourself, inspector, if the case happened to be as I've stated
it? No? Neither should I. It seems as if there might be a likelier
solution. Ever visit a sick friend?”
“Yes,” said Armadale, obviously puzzled by the question.
“Did you ever notice, then, that it's easier to talk to him if he's
sitting up in bed and not lying down?”
“There's something in that,” the inspector admitted. “I've never paid
any attention to it; but, now you mention it, sir, I believe you're
right. One gets more out of a talk with a man when he's not lying down
in bed. I suppose one's unaccustomed to it.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account