Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
Goethe has indicated in monumental form the point of view of the
highest knowledge in the words: “If I know my relation to myself and
to the outer world, I call it truth. And thus every one can have his
own truth, and yet it is always one and the same.” Each has his own
truth: because each is an individual, separate being, beside and along
with others. These other beings act upon him through his organs. From
the individual standpoint at which he is placed, and according to the
constitution of his power of perception, he builds up his own truth
for himself in intercourse with the things around him. He acquires his
relation to things. If, then, he enters into self-knowledge, if he
learns to know his relation to himself, then his special separate truth
is merged in the universal Truth; and this universal Truth is in all
the same.
The understanding of the raising of the individual, of the single self,
into the Universal Self in the personality, is regarded by deeper
natures as the secret which reveals itself in the inmost heart of man
as the root-mystery of life. And Goethe has found an apt expression for
this: “And so long as thou hast not that, this: Die and Become! Then
thou art but a melancholy guest upon this dark earth.”
Not a mere repetition in thought, but a real part of the world-process,
is that which goes on in man’s inner life. The world would not be what
it is if the factor belonging thereto in the human soul did not play
its part. And if one calls the highest which is attainable by man the
Divine, then one must say that this Divine is not present as something
external, to be repeated pictorially in the human mind, but that this
Divine is awakened in man. Angelus Silesius has found the right words
for this: “I know that without me God can live no instant; if I become
nothing, He must of necessity give up the ghost.” “Without me God
may make no single smallest worm: if I do not sustain it with Him,
then it must straightway perish.” Only he can make such an assertion
who presupposes that in man something comes to light, without which
external being cannot exist. If everything pertaining to the “worm”
were there present without man, then one could not possibly say that it
must perish if man did not sustain it.
The innermost kernel of the world comes to life as spiritual content in
self-knowledge. The experience of self-knowledge means for man working
and weaving within the kernel of the world. He who is permeated with
self-knowledge naturally carries out his own action in the light of
self-knowledge. Human action is--in general--determined by motives.
Robert Hamerling, the poet-philosopher, has rightly said (_Atomistik
des Willens_, p. 213):
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account