Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others — John Shaqi
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
The world of Meister Eckhart’s conceptions is aglow through and through
with the feeling that things become reborn as higher entities in the
spirit of man. Like the greatest Christian theologian of the Middle
Ages, St. Thomas Aquinas, who lived from 1225 till 1274, Meister
Eckhart belonged to the Dominican Order. Eckhart was an unqualified
admirer of St. Thomas; and this will seem the more intelligible when
we fix our gaze upon Eckhart’s whole manner of conceiving things. He
believed himself to be as completely in harmony with the teachings of
the Christian Church as he assumed a like agreement on the part of
St. Thomas. Eckhart had neither the desire to take aught away from the
content of Christianity, nor the wish to add anything to it; but he
desired to bring forward this content anew in his own way. It forms no
part of the spiritual needs of a personality such as he was to set up
new truths of this or the other kind in the place of old ones. Such a
personality has grown completely intertwined with the content which it
has received from tradition; but it craves to give to this content a
new form, a new life.
Eckhart desired, without doubt, to remain an orthodox Christian. The
Christian truths were his own; only he desired to regard these truths
in another way from that, for instance, in which St. Thomas Aquinas had
done. St. Thomas accepted two sources of knowledge: Revelation, in
matters of faith, and Reason, in those of research. Reason recognises
the laws of things, that is, the spiritual in nature. Reason can raise
itself above nature and grasp in the spirit from one side the Divine
Being underlying nature. But it does not attain in this way to merging
itself in the full being of God. A still higher truth-content must come
to meet it. That is given in the Holy Scripture, which reveals what man
cannot attain to through himself. The truth-content of the Scripture
must be accepted by man; Reason can defend it, Reason can seek to
understand it as well as possible through its powers of knowing; but
never can Reason engender that truth from within the spirit of man. Not
what the spirit perceives is the highest truth, but what has come to
this spirit from without.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account