Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
When Eckhart recalls the saying of St. Paul: “Put ye on Jesus Christ,”
he means to imply in this saying the meaning: Sink yourselves into
yourselves, dive down into self-contemplation: and from out the depths
of your being, God will shine forth to meet you; He illumines all
things for you; you have found Him within you; you have become united
with God’s Being. “God became man, that I might become God.”
In his booklet upon _Loneliness_, Eckhart expresses himself as follows
upon the relation of the outer perception to the inner: “Here thou
must know that the Masters say that in every man there are two kinds
of man: the one is called the outer man, and yet he acts through the
power of the soul. The other man is called the inner man, that is, that
which is within the man. Now thou must know that every man who loveth
God maketh no more use of the powers of the soul in the outer man than
so far as the five senses absolutely require; and that which is within
turns not itself to the five senses, save in so far as it is the guide
and conductor of the five senses, and shepherds them, so that they
follow not after their craving to bestiality.” One who speaks in such
wise of the inner man can no longer direct his gaze upon a Being of
things lying outside himself; for he sees clearly that from no kind or
species of the outer world can this Being come to him.
An objector might urge: What can it matter to the things of the outer
world, what you add to them out of your own mind? Do but rely upon your
own senses. They alone give you information of the outer world. Do not
adulterate, by a mental addition, what your senses give you in purity,
without admixture, as the image of the outer world. Your eye tells
you what colour is; what your mind knows about colour, of that there
is nothing whatever in colour itself. To this, from Meister Eckhart’s
standpoint, the answer would have to be: The senses are a physical
apparatus; therefore what they have to tell us about objects can
concern only that which is physical in the objects. And this physical
factor in the objects communicates itself to me in such wise that in
myself a physical process is set going.
Colour, as a physical process of the outer world, sets up a physical
process in my eye and brain. Thereby I perceive colour. But in this
manner I can perceive of colour only so much as is physical, sensuous.
Sense-perception cuts out everything non-sensuous from objects. Objects
are thus by sense-perception stripped of everything about them which is
non-sensuous. If I then advance to the spiritual, the ideal content,
I in fact only reinstate in the objects what sense-perception has
shut out therefrom. Thus sense-perception does not exhibit to me the
deepest Being of objects, it rather separates me from that being. But
the spiritual, the ideal conception, seizing upon them again, unites me
with that being. It shows me that objects are inwardly of exactly the
same spiritual (_geistigen_) nature as I myself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account