Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
To understand the difference between personalities like Eckhart and
Tauler, one must see quite clearly how a man stands towards his higher
cognitions. Man is interwoven with the sense-world and the laws of
nature by which that sense-world is ruled. He is himself a product of
that world. He lives because its forces and its materials are at work
in him; nay, he perceives this sense-world and judges of it by laws,
according to which both he himself and that world are alike built up.
If he turns his eyes upon an object, not only does the object present
itself to him as a complex of interacting forces, ruled by nature’s
laws, but the eye, with which he sees the object is itself a body
built up according to just such laws and of just such forces; and the
seeing, too, takes place by similar laws and forces. If we had reached
the goal of natural science, we should be able to follow out this play
of the forces of nature according to natural laws right up into the
highest regions of thought-formation,--but in the very act of doing
this, we raise ourselves _above_ this play of forces. For do we not
stand above and beyond all the “uniformities which make up the laws of
nature,” when we over-see the whole and recognise how we ourselves fit
into nature? We _see_ with our eyes according to laws of nature. But we
know also the laws, according to which we see.
We can take our stand upon a higher summit and overlook at once
both ourselves and the outer world in their mutual interplay. Is
there not here a something working in us, which is higher than the
sensuous-organic personality working with Nature’s forces and according
to Nature’s laws? In such activity does there still remain any wall
of division between our inner selves and the outer world? That which
here judges and gains for itself insight is no longer our separated
personality; it is rather the general world-being, which has torn down
the barrier between the inner and outer worlds and now embraces both
alike. As true as it is that, judged by the outer appearance, I still
remain the same separated individual when I have thus torn down this
barrier, so true is it also that, judged according to essential being,
I am no longer this separated unit. Henceforth there lives in me the
feeling that there speaks in my soul the All-Being, which embraces both
myself and the entire world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account