Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others — John Shaqi
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
The talk about the God who contemplates Himself in man’s inner being,
takes on a different character in one who has recognised this. He
attaches little importance to the fact that an insight already attained
has led him into the depths of the All-Being; instead, his spiritual
nature acquires a new character. It unfolds itself further in the
direction determined by the All-Being. Such a man not only looks at
the world differently from one who merely understands: he lives his
life otherwise. He does not talk of the meaning which life already has
through the forces and laws of the world: but he gives anew a fresh
meaning to his life. As little as the fish already has in itself what
makes its appearance on a later level of evolution as the mammal, as
little has the understanding man already in himself what shall be
born from him as the higher man. If the fish could know itself and
the things around it, it would regard the being-a-fish as the meaning
of life. It would say: the All-Being is like the fish: in the fish
the All-Being beholds itself. Thus would the fish speak as long as it
remained constant to its understanding kind of knowledge. In reality it
does not remain constant thereto. It reaches out beyond its knowledge
with its activity. It becomes a reptile and later a mammal. The meaning
which it gives to itself in reality reaches out beyond the meaning
which mere contemplation gives to it.
In man also this must be so. He gives himself a meaning in reality; he
does not halt and stand still at the meaning he already has, which his
contemplation shows him. Knowledge leaps out beyond itself, if only it
understands itself aright. Knowledge cannot deduce the world from a
ready-made God; it can only unfold itself from a germ in the direction
towards a God. The man who has understood this will not regard God as
something that is outside of him; he will deal with God as a being who
wanders with him towards a goal, which at the outset is just as unknown
as the nature of the mammal is unknown to the fish. He does not aim to
be the knower of the hidden, or of the self-revealing existent God, but
to be the friend of the divine doing and working, which is exalted over
both being and non-being.
The layman, who came to the Master, was a “Friend of God” in this
sense, and through him the Master became from a contemplator of the
being of God, one who is “alive in the spirit,” one who not only
contemplated, but lived in the higher sense. The Master now no longer
brought forth concepts and ideas of the understanding from his inner
nature, but these concepts and ideas burst forth from him as living,
actualised spirit. He no longer merely edified his hearers; he shook
the very foundations of their being. He no longer plunged their souls
into their inner being; he led them into a new life. This is recounted
to us symbolically: about forty people fell down through his preaching
and lay as if dead.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account