Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
In the strictest sense, therefore, the eyes of Paracelsus are directed
to Nature, in order to overhear from herself what she has to say about
that which she brings forth. He seeks to explore the laws of chemistry,
so that, in his sense, he may work as an Alchemist. He pictures
to himself all bodies as compounded out of three root-substances:
Salt, Sulphur, and Mercury. What he thus names, naturally does not
coincide with that which later chemistry solely and strictly calls
by these names; just as little as that which Paracelsus conceives of
as the root-substance is such in the sense of our later chemistry.
Different things are called by the same names at different times.
What the ancients called the four elements: Earth, Water, Air, and
Fire, we still have to-day. But we call these four “elements” no
longer “elements,” but states of aggregation and have for them the
designations: solid, liquid, gaseous and etheric. The Earth, for
instance, was for the ancients not earth, but the “solid.”
Again, we can clearly recognise the three root-substances of Paracelsus
in contemporary conceptions, though not in present names of like sound.
For Paracelsus, dissolution in a liquid and burning are the two most
important chemical processes which he utilises. If a body be dissolved
or burnt, it breaks up into its parts. Something remains behind as
insoluble; something dissolves, or is burnt. What is left behind is
to him of the nature of Salt; the soluble (liquid) of the nature of
Mercury; while he terms Sulphur-like the part that can be burnt.
All this, taken as relating to material things, may leave the man cold
who cannot look out beyond such natural processes; whoever seeks at all
costs to grasp the spirit with his senses, will people these processes
with all sorts of ensouling beings. He, however, who like Paracelsus
knows how to regard them in connection with the whole, which permits
its secret to become revealed in man’s inner being,--he accepts them,
as the senses offer them; he does not first re-interpret them; for just
as the occurrences of Nature lie before us in their sensible reality,
so too do they, in their own way, reveal to us the riddle of existence.
That which through their sensible reality they have to unveil from
within the soul of man, stands, for him who strives after the light of
higher knowledge, far higher than all supernatural wonders that man
can invent or get revealed to him about their suppositious “spirit.”
There is no “Spirit of Nature,” capable of uttering loftier truths
than the mighty works of Nature herself, when our soul links itself
in friendship with that Nature and listens to the revelations of her
secrets in intimate and tender intercourse. Such friendship with Nature
was what Paracelsus sought.
VALENTINE WEIGEL AND JACOB BOEHME
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account