Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
One world-riddle remains as a disquieting presence in Jacob Boehme’s
soul, driving him on to knowledge. He believes himself to be in his
spirit enfolded in a divine harmony; but when he looks around him, he
sees discord everywhere in the divine workings. To man belongs the
light of Wisdom; and yet he is exposed to error; in him lives the
impulse to the good, and yet the discord of evil sounds throughout
the whole of human development. Nature is governed by its own great
laws; yet its harmony is disturbed by happenings of no purport, and
the warfare of the elements. How is this discord in the harmonious
world-whole to be understood? This question tortures Jacob Boehme. It
strides into the centre of the world of his thought. He strives to gain
a view of the world as a whole, which shall include the discordant.
For how can a conception which leaves the actual present discord
unexplained explain the world? The discord must be explained out of the
harmony, the evil out of the good itself. Let us restrict ourselves,
in speaking of these things, to the good and the evil, wherein the
lack of harmony in the narrower sense finds its expression. For,
fundamentally, Jacob Boehme also restricts himself to this. He can do
so, for Nature and man appear to him as a single entity. He sees in
both similar laws and processes. The purposeless seems to him an evil
something in Nature, just as evil seems to him something purposeless in
man. Similar fundamental forces rule both here and there. To one who
has known the origin of evil in man, the source of evil in Nature also
lies open and clear.
Now, how can the evil as well as the good flow forth from the very
same Root-Being? Speaking in Jacob Boehme’s sense, one would give
the following answer. The Root-Being does not live out its existence
in itself. The multiplicity of the world shares in this existence.
As the human body lives its life, not as a single member, but as a
multiplicity of members, so also the Root-Being. And as human life is
poured out into this multiplicity of members, so too the Root-Being
is poured out into the manifoldness of the things of this world. As
true as it is that the entire man has only one life, so true is it
that every member has its own life. And as little as it contradicts
the whole harmonious life of a man, that his hand should turn itself
against his own body and wound it, so little is it impossible that the
things of the world, which live the life of the Root-Being in their own
way, should turn themselves against each other. Thus the Root-Being, in
dividing itself among different lives, confers upon each such life the
capacity to turn itself against the whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account