Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
Whoever, henceforth, strove after higher knowledge, must needs come to
an understanding with this expanded world of the senses. In earlier
centuries, the brooding mind of man stood before a world of facts. Now
he was confronted with a new task. No longer could the things of earth
only express this nature from within man’s inner being. This inner
nature of his was called on to embrace the spirit of a sense-world,
which fills the All of Space everywhere alike.
The thinker of Nola, PHILOTHEO GIORDANO BRUNO (1548-1600) found himself
faced by such a problem. The senses have conquered the universe of
space; henceforth the Spirit is no more to be found in space. Thus man
was guided from without to seek henceforward for the Spirit there alone
where from out of profound inner experiences those glorious thinkers
sought it, whose ranks our previous expositions have led before us.
These thinkers drew upon a view of the world to which, later on, the
advance of natural knowledge forces humanity. The sun of those ideas,
which later should shine upon a new view of Nature, with them still
stands below the horizon; but their light already appears as the early
dawn at a time when men’s thoughts of Nature itself still lay in the
darkness of night.
The sixteenth century gave the heavenly spaces to natural science
for the sense-world to which it rightfully belongs; by the end of
the nineteenth century, this science had advanced so far that, even
within the phenomena of plant, animal, and human life, it could assign
to the world of sensible facts that which belongs to it. Neither,
then, in the æther above, nor in the development of living creatures,
can this natural science henceforth seek for anything but sensible,
matter-of-fact processes. As the thinker in the sixteenth century
had to say: “The earth is a star among other stars, subject to the
same laws as other stars”; so must the thinker of the nineteenth
century say: “Man, whatever may be his origin and his future, is
for anthropology only a mammal, and further, that mammal whose
organisation, needs and diseases are the most complex, whose brain,
with its marvellous capacities, has reached the highest level of
development.”[19]
[19] Paul Topinard: _Anthropologie_, Leipzig, 1888, p. 528.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account