Mythology among the Hebrews and Its Historical DevelopmentGoldziher, Ignác
Religion
Mythology among the Hebrews and Its Historical Development
Goldziher, Ignác
Jewish mythology; Judaism -- History -- To 70 A.D.
This is meant only as a general assertion, and is the general
impression left by the Prophetical books. There are, in this as in
other respects, various grades perceptible between the different
Prophets. The prophetical Jahveistic idea is not so powerful and
exclusive in all as in the Babylonian Isaiah.
Footnote 698:
‘I am I’ (hû being equivalent to the verb _to be_)='I am who I
am.'—TR.
Footnote 699:
See Kuenen, _Religion of Israel_, III. 41.
Footnote 700:
Bunsen must be named as the writer who lays the most stress on the
importance of this anî anî hû, bringing this formula into connexion
with the metaphysical definition of the idea of Jahveh (_God in
History_, I. p. 74 _et seq._). Lessing’s ‘Nur euer Er heisst Er’ (only
_your_ He is called He, _Nathan der Weise_, I. 4) is with justice
adduced by Bunsen.
Footnote 701:
B. Constant de Rebecque, _Du Polythéisme Romain_, II. 102, quoted by
Buckle, _Civilisation_, II. 303.
Footnote 702:
It is best to read with Gesenius miḳḳesem for miḳḳedem.
Footnote 703:
Hosea XIV. 4 [3] must also be noted, where the alliance with Assyria
is condemned in the words ‘Asshur will not save us; we shall not ride
on horses.’ See also Zech. IX. 10, X. 5, Micah V. 9 [10].
Footnote 704:
See Ezek. XXXVII. 15–28.
Footnote 705:
See on the other side Zunz in the _Zeitsch. d. D. M. G._, 1873, p.
688, thesis 14 _et seq._
Footnote 706:
These two passages (Mic. VI. 4 and Mal. III. 22 [IV. 4]) appears not
to have been noticed by Michel Nicolas in his '_Etudes critiques sur
la Bible_,' Paris 1862, I. 351, where he says of Moses, ‘Son nom ne se
trouve que deux fois dans les écrits des prophètes qui sont parvenus
jusqu'à nous—(_Esaie_, LXIII. 12; _Jér._ XV. 1).’
Footnote 707:
I have given particular prominence to this on account of the opposite
view taken by Max Müller in his _Chips_, I. 361 _et seq._
Footnote 708:
His fondness for humanising God by anthropomorphic expressions is the
only feature, the reasons for which are not patent.
Footnote 709:
See Knobel, _Die Bücher Numeri, Deuteronomium und Josua_, pp. 539,
554.
Footnote 710:
See Knobel, _Die Bücher etc._, p. 529.
Footnote 711:
The relative clause is dependent upon _Debharîm_ only.
Footnote 712:
See Knobel, _Die Bücher etc._, p. 579.
-----
CHAPTER X.
_THE HEBREW MYTH IN THE BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account