|_Mareighât_ |14 |(Conder’s _Heth and | 29; iv. 46; | (?)* | | Moab_, p. 14, and | xxxiv. 6; | | | _Quarterly Statement_, | Josh. xiii. | | | 1882, p. 88.) _See_ | 20 | | | Peor (Num. xxii. 28), | | | | which is perhaps | | | | _Minyeh_, at west end | | | | of same ridge. | | | | =BETH-REHOB= (1)|Judg. xviii. |_Hunîn_ (?) |-- |Somewhere near the | 28 | | | town of Laish or Dan. | | | | Possibly Hunîn, a | | | | fortress commanding | | | | the plain of Hûleh, in | | | | which the city of Dan | | | | (Tell el Kâdy) lay. | | | | (Robinson.) | | | | =BETH-REHOB= (2)|2 Sam. x. 6 |_Not |-- |An Aramean state south | | identified_ | | of Zobah and near the | | | | Euphrates. | | | | =BETHSAMOS= |1 Esdr. v. 18 |_Hizmeh_ |-- |Same as Beth Azmaveth | | | | and Azmaveth, which | | | | see. | | | | =BETH-SAN= |1 Macc. v. | |-- |_See_ Beth-shean. | 52; xii. 40, | | | | 41 | | | | | | | =BETH-SHEAN= or |Josh. xvii. |_Beisân_ |10 |Represented by the =BETH-SHAN= | 11, 16; | | | modern town ‘Beisân’ | Judg. i. 27; | | | and the extensive | 1 Sam. xxxi. | | | ruins surrounding it. | 10, 12; 2 | | | (_Mem._ I. 101-107; | Sam. xxi. | | | Sh. IX.) | 12; 1 Kings | | | | iv. 12; 1 | | | | Chron. vii. | | | | 29 | | | | | | | =BETH-SHEMESH= |Josh. xv. 10; |_ʾAin Shems_ |14 |On the boundary of (1) | xxi. 16; 1 | | | Judah; now the ruins | Sam. vi. 9, | | | called ‘ʾAin Shems’ in | 20; 1 Kings | | | the valley of Sorek. | iv. 9; 2 | | | (_Mem._ III.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account