Narrative of the Fenian invasion of CanadaSomerville, Alexander
History
Narrative of the Fenian invasion of Canada
Somerville, Alexander
Canada -- History -- Fenian Invasions, 1866-1870
THE WOUNDED.—Lieut. Routh, of the 13th, has stated that when he and
other wounded volunteers were left in the house, (log house on the
map) Colonel O’Neil entered, and after enquiring about their wounds,
expressed hope that the Lieut. would recover. “Does your sword-belt
hurt you?” said the Fenian chief. “Take it off,” replied Mr. Routh;
“I am your prisoner; I suppose the sword is, by right of war,
yours.” O’Neil removed it, handling the wounded officer tenderly;
then said: “No, I will not take it, it’s possession may be a solace
to you; I will leave it by your side.” “Thank you,” rejoined Mr.
Routh, “but some one less kind may come and take it.” Said O’Neil
“Let me conceal it under the bedding.” And he placed the sword under
the mattress, where it might not be seen by any less honorable
visitors, and in mild accents said farewell. Mr. Routh has recovered,
but no one then thought him likely to recover.
Mr. Lawson of Colborne, who was present near the fight and remained
among the wounded, relates that O’Neil or some other Fenian officer
gave him a written protection to go over the field and collect the
wounded into the houses. Major Denison on this, pp. 69, 70, says:
“Before closing this chapter I must mention that from all accounts
the Fenians, except in so far as they were wrong in invading a
peaceful country, in carrying on an unjustifiable war, behaved
remarkably well to the inhabitants, I spent three weeks in Fort
Erie and conversed with dozens of the people of the place, and
was astonished at the universal testimony borne by them to the
unvarying good conduct of this rabble while among them. They
claimed food and horses, but they can hardly be blamed for that
as an act of war, but can only be blamed because the war itself,
which alone could give them the right to take these things was
unjustifiable and wicked. They have been called plunderers, robbers
and marauders, yet, no matter how unwilling we may be to admit it,
the positive fact remains, that they stole but few valuables, that
they destroyed, comparatively speaking, little or nothing and that
they committed no outrages on the inhabitants but treated every one
with unvarying courtesy.
“On taking a number of the Welland Battery and the Naval Company
prisoners they treated them with the greatest kindness, putting the
officers under their parole and returning them their side-arms,
taking them down to the wharf on their departure and releasing
them, bidding them adieu with expressions of good will.”
But the treatment of the University rifleman, the youthful student,
J. H. Mewburn, was by evidence of surviving associates, not tender
nor chivalrous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account