The perversion of the passage is the more noteworthy from the fact,
that while Ham was the offender, on account of whose conduct the curse
was pronounced--so that the reader is naturally looking for some
manifestation towards him personally--his name does not appear. The
curse, though three times repeated, falls steadily upon Canaan, one of
the four sons. When the three sons of Noah came forth with their father
out of the ark, the historian simply says, "And Ham is the father
of Canaan." True, so he was, and was also the father of Misraim, and
Cush, and Phut. Shem, too, was the father of five sons, and Japheth of
seven; but nothing is said at that time about all these, only, "Ham is
the father of Canaan." And so also when Ham's irreverent wickedness is
mentioned, it is "Ham the father of Canaan."
What is perhaps still more noticeable, when the curse is passed, and
the historian in the next chapter takes up the genealogy of the race
after the flood, and shows us the first founders of kingdoms and
nations, the only instance in all that long list, when he stops to give
us the boundaries of any people, is in this case of Canaan. It seems
as if God took especial pains to set the people who were to be cursed,
apart from the rest, that there need be no doubt who they were, and
where they lived.
But if we take the race of Ham generally, we shall find that for two
thousand years after the flood it continued by far the most noticeable
and conspicuous of the three branches. For some reason the early
developments of civilization were almost entirely in this race. Egypt
and Assyria, by far the grandest empires of antiquity, were both of
this Hametic order. Misraim, the son of Ham, is the reputed father of
the one, and Nimrod, the grandson, of the other. So obvious was this
fact, at least as respects Egypt, that it is familiarly called in the
Scriptures "the land of Ham." "Israel also came into Egypt, and Jacob
sojourned in the land of Ham." And again, "He sent Moses His servant,
and Aaron whom He had chosen. They showed His signs among them, and
wonders in the land of Ham."
OLD DINAH.
Dinah was a slave. Her mistress was an Indian woman, into whose dark
mind not a single ray of gospel light had ever penetrated. She lived
among a small tribe on the borders of Tennessee, and although at the
age of forty, or a little over, she was called Old Dinah. The Indian
mistress and all her servants had been baptized by a Roman priest;
but why, or wherefore, none of them knew. Dinah said, in relating the
circumstance, "I allers thought the white folks had something to tell
that we did not know about, and I used to think what could it be. When
the missionaries come here with the Bible, then I know what it is."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account