Wealth and social position, rather than health and intellectuality, determine as many marriages today as when Darwin wrote, and America’s highest legislative body has not yet repealed the law against the dissemination of knowledge of means to prevent conception. Yet too many children in poor families not only means dire poverty and unhappiness instead of comfort and happiness, but oftentimes desertion, divorce, forced immorality or crime. It is just as necessary to be able to limit the number of children so that each will at least get a good start in life as it is to bring healthy children into the world, since healthy children can not remain healthy and develop as well under unfavorable as under favorable conditions. Did the law affect rich and poor alike it would not be so pernicious, but such is not the case, since the largest families in this country are found among the poor and ignorant, the very ones who can least afford to have many dependents. Without being so intended, it is class legislation. The healthy, well nourished and well educated class escapes, the poor, ill-nourished, and ignorant class bears the burden until this burden is shifted on society in the form of beggar, defective, imbecile or criminal. If all the members of Congress made a tour of the tenement districts of New York or other large cities, saw the overworked fathers and overbred mothers, the ragged, ill-nourished and oftentimes diseased children, inquired into the total earnings of the family and the necessary expenses, ate of their bread and breathed their air, if our congressmen did this, then the fate of the law as it now stands would be sealed. But our congressmen are not going to make any such tour, they are not even going to inform themselves by study of the actual conditions, but will do something far easier by voting an appropriation for the study of hog cholera, the foot and mouth disease of cattle, the Texas cattle tick or some other measure of more apparent benefit to the people—and the congressman. To vote on appropriations like the above can not weaken the legislator, to vote to repeal the present law might lose him a large following in some communities. Yet the repeal of the present law in regard to preventives is the first step in eugenics, and without the repeal the best efforts of the best men and women will accomplish but little.—_W. T. B._ PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITALS CURB TRACHOMA.