Transcribed from the 1833 J. H. Parker edition by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org NATIONAL APOSTASY CONSIDERED IN A SERMON PREACHED IN ST. MARY’S, OXFORD, BEFORE HIS MAJESTY’S JUDGES OF ASSIZE, ON SUNDAY, JULY 14, 1833. BY JOHN KEBLE, M. A. FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE, AND POETRY PROFESSOR IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. * * * * * OXFORD, PRINTED BY S. COLLINGWOOD, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY, FOR J. H. PARKER. SOLD ALSO BY J. G. AND F. RIVINGTON, ST. PAUL’S CHURCHYARD, AND WATERLOO-PLACE, LONDON. MDCCCXXXIII. ADVERTISEMENT. SINCE the following pages were prepared for the press, the calamity, in anticipation of which they were written, has actually overtaken this portion of the Church of GOD. The Legislature of England and Ireland, (_the members of which are not even bound to profess belief in the Atonement_,) this body has virtually usurped the commission of those whom our SAVIOUR entrusted with _at least one voice_ in making ecclesiastical laws, on matters wholly or partly spiritual. The same Legislature has also ratified, to its full extent, this principle;—that the Apostolical Church in this realm is henceforth only to stand, in the eye of the State, as _one sect among many_, depending, for any preeminence she may still appear to retain, merely upon the accident of her having a strong party in the country. It is a moment, surely, full of deep solicitude to all those members of the Church who still believe her authority divine, and the oaths and obligations, by which they are bound to her, undissolved and indissoluble by calculations of human expediency. Their anxiety turns not so much on the consequences, to the State, of what has been done, (_they_ are but too evident,) as on the line of conduct which they are bound themselves to pursue. How may they continue their communion with the Church _established_, (hitherto the pride and comfort of their lives,) without any taint of those Erastian Principles on which she is now avowedly to be governed? What answer can we make henceforth to the partisans of the Bishop of Rome, when they taunt us with being a mere Parliamentarian Church? And how, consistently with our present relations to _the State_, can even the doctrinal purity and integrity of the MOST SACRED ORDER be preserved?