Natural & Artificial Sewage TreatmentJones, Alfred Stowell
Science
Natural & Artificial Sewage Treatment
Jones, Alfred Stowell
Sewage
In connection with this point it may not be without interest to
mention here that even the late M. Pasteur at one time of his career
considered the wholesale spreading of disease germs on sewage farms
might prove highly injurious to the public health of the
neighbourhood. As he himself admitted, he based his fears on purely
theoretical considerations and opposed, for this reason, the extension
of the sewage farms in the neighbourhood of Paris. But when, later on,
he was made acquainted with the results observed on the Berlin farms,
he tacitly modified his views and ceased to oppose the extension of
the Paris farms.
[Sidenote: No well-authenticated case is on record where a sewage farm
has acted as the focus of a local outbreak of typhoid fever.]
Indeed, search as I might, I have not been able to discover one single
instance where a sewage farm has acted as the focus of a local
outbreak. On the contrary, during one or two small epidemics of
typhoid fever in Berlin, no case of this complaint has been observed
on the sewage farms of that city.
[Sidenote: Experience on the Berlin farms.]
Concerning the escape of pathogenic micro-organisms into streams and
rivers, no case is on record where such a thing has actually occurred:
indeed, the very painstaking investigations on the Berlin farms have
led to negative results.
[Sidenote: Observations made at the Freiburg sewage farm.]
Another sewage farm, that of Freiburg in Baden, has likewise been made
the subject of careful and long-continued investigation by Dr. Korn,
who, for the twelve months ending August 1897, made no less than 165
elaborate chemical and bacteriological examinations. Summing up his
observations on the presence of bacteria in the effluents from subsoil
drains, he remarks:
“Apart from the few exceptional cases of high numbers, generally
speaking my experiments show that the number of germs in the
subsoil drain effluents is relatively small, and even omitting
these experiments, in which a dilution with subsoil water must
have taken place, the number of micro-organisms is still so small
that the effects of filtration through soil are clearly
perceptible. In addition to this—and this is of considerable
importance in forming a judgment—it must be borne in mind that
the bacteria in sewage are principally derived from the
intestines, whereas in the subsoil drain effluents the
inhabitants of the intestines are either not present at all or
only in very small numbers compared with the number of soil and
water bacteria, which are always present. Out of 165 examinations
I only succeeded in 18 cases in proving the presence of bacterium
coli.”
[Sidenote: Bacterium coli no longer a true criterion of sewage
pollution.]
[Sidenote: Dr. Weissenfels’ conclusions.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account