Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
The ancient Romans believed in the existence of a crystalline stone
which they called alectorius, as large as a bean, and to be found in the
gizzard of a cock, though not by any means, discoverable in every fowl
cut open. This stone was held to have the wonderful property of rendering
the human possessor of it invisible. It may indeed have had the same
effect on the original owner, as there could scarcely be an authentic
instance of a stone of such peculiar property being found, but if the
fowl itself could not be seen it is scarcely to be wondered at that the
stone within it should be equally invisible. The belief in some such
stone was one of the numerous articles of faith of the Middle Ages, but
instead of the property of invisibility being attached to its possessor
they sometimes substituted for it the much more prosaic idea that its
owner could never feel thirsty, while the way to discover the bird that
possessed it was simplicity itself, it being only necessary to discover
which fowl at feeding time never drank. The first belief is much the more
tenable, and is in fact impossible of refutation, as the world may be
full of the owners of alectorius, invisible to us, and therefore unknown.
The cock was at one time supposed to possess the power of laying eggs
from which were reared the deadly cockatrice. “When the cock is past
seven years old an egg grows within him, whereat he greatly wonders. He
seeks privately a warm place, and scratches a hole for a nest, to which
he goes ten times daily. A toad privily watches him, and examines the
nest every day to see if the egg be yet laid. When the toad finds the
egg he rejoices much, and at length hatches it, bringing forth an animal
with the head, neck, and breast of a cock, and from thence downward the
body of a serpent.”[87] In the year 1474 a cock at Basle was publicly
accused of having laid one of these very objectionable eggs, and after
a short trial[88] was sentenced to death and burnt, together with the
egg, in the market place, amid a great concourse of the towns-folk, who
were right joyfully thankful to feel that a great peril had been averted
by the prompt action of their rulers, for a cockatrice was indeed no
laughing matter to those who thought it one of the possibilities of life.
In England the hens have entirely usurped the egg-laying department, and
we are therefore spared the mortification of finding that our hoped-for
chick has assumed the less welcome form of a cockatrice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account