Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliabilityHulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
History
Natural history, lore and legend : $b Being some few examples of quaint and by-gone beliefs gathered in from divers authorities, ancient and mediæval, of varying degrees of reliability
Hulme, F. Edward (Frederick Edward)
Animals, Mythical; Monsters; Science -- History; Zoology -- History
The basilisk, a wingless dragon, according to some authorities—a serpent,
if we may credit others—was a peculiarly objectionable creation, not of
nature, but of man. Like all such creatures, it is extremely difficult
to get a very definite idea of it, since imagination has run rampant
in dealing with it. It was but twelve fingers’ breadth long, according
to some writers; this we may take to mean some eight or nine inches
long,[102] but, unfortunately, its powers of mischief were out of all
proportion to its size. It wore a diadem upon its head, as a sign of
its kingship over all other serpents, and its poison was death without
remedy. Pliny, however, shall be allowed to describe the venomous little
monster in his own way, as he does so with a vivid force that it is
impossible to surpass:—“With his hies he driveth away other serpents; he
moveth his body forward not by multiplied windings like other serpents,
but he goeth with half his body upright and aloft from the ground; he
killeth all shrubs not only that he toucheth, but that he breatheth upon;
he burns up herbs and breaketh the stones, so great is his power for
mischief. It is received of a truth that one of them being killed with
a lance by a man on horseback, the poison was so strong that it passed
along the staff and destroyed both horse and man.” Its touch caused the
flesh to fall from the bones of the animal with which it came in contact,
and even the glance of its eye was death upon whomsoever it fell. It will
be remembered that Shakespeare refers to this belief in the utterance of
the Lady Ann in response to Richard’s observation on her eyes—
“Would that they were basilisk’s to strike thee dead.”
In 2 Henry VI. (act iii. sc. 6) the king exclaims,
“Come, basilisk, and kill the innocent gazer with thy sight,”
—while in Henry V. (act iii. sc. 2) Queen Isabel says—
“Your eyes, which hitherto have borne in them
Against the French, that met them in their bent
The fatal balls of murthering basilisks.”
Suffolk in cursing his enemies invokes against them the deadly basilisk,
while Gloster boasts that he will “slay more gazers than the basilisk.”
Spenser in like manner mentions one who—
“Secretly his enemies did slay
Like as the Basilisk, of serpent’s seede
From powerful eyes close venim did convey
Into the looker’s hart, and killed farre away.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account