Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia) — John Shaqi
Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia)Burkett, Ray D.
Science
Natural History of Cottonmouth Moccasin, Agkistrodon piscovorus (Reptilia)
Burkett, Ray D.
Agkistrodon piscivorus; Snakes
By means of the facial or loreal pit found in all crotalids, the snake
is able to detect objects having temperatures different from that of the
surroundings of the objects. In detecting prey the tongue acts to
sharpen the sense of "smell" by conveying particles to Jacobson's organs
in the roof of the mouth. On many occasions cottonmouths appeared to
rely solely on sight; they passed within a few inches of prey,
apparently unaware of its presence until it moved. When pools of water
begin to dry up toward the end of summer, cottonmouths often congregate
and feed on dying fish. In these instances the fish are usually taken as
they come to the surface. In laboratory observations moccasins seize
live fish and some moccasins carry the fish until they have received
lethal doses of venom; afterward the fish are swallowed. But grasping
and manipulation of the prey occurs without the fangs' being employed,
especially in the case of dead fish. On one occasion a cottonmouth was
observed to grasp the edge of a glass dish that had contained fish and
apparently retained the odor. On another occasion I placed several fish
in a bowl, rubbed a stick on the fish, and then touched each snake
lightly on the nose with the stick. The snakes crawled directly to the
bowl and began feeding. At other times these same snakes crawled around
the cage in an apparent attempt to locate the food but paid little
attention to fish held in front of them. If the catching of prey under
natural conditions were as uncoordinated as it sometimes is in
captivity, the snakes probably would not be able to survive.
Wharton (1960:127-129) described tail-luring in one individual of a
76-day-old brood of cottonmouths. The snake lay loosely coiled with the
tail held about six centimeters from the ground; a constant waving
motion passed posteriorly through the terminal inch of the tail. These
movements ceased at 7:20 p.m. but were resumed at 7:40 a.m. the
following day. All observations were under artificial light. The "caudal
lure" as a means of obtaining prey has been described in other species
and related genera by Neill (1960:194) and Ditmars (1915:424).
Various authors have suggested that the method of capture differs
according to the kind of prey. Allen and Swindell (1948:5) stated that
cottonmouths retain their hold after striking fish or frogs but will
release a mouse after delivering a bite and are timid in striking at
larger rodents. Neill (1947:203) noted that a cottonmouth always waited
several minutes after biting a large rat before approaching its prey.
This same type of behavior has been reported for copperheads (Fitch,
1960:194) and rattlesnakes (Klauber, 1956:618). Cottonmouths observed by
me retained a strong hold on fish, frogs, and sometimes mice, but almost
always released large mice and baby chicks, which were not eaten until
after death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account