Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
Genghis Khan, in the twelfth century, was the next great conqueror and
mighty leader of those vast Mongolic hordes which, at various times,
have inundated the ancient world, and in their desolating march swept
away numerous empires and extinguished whole populations. Genghis Khan,
though of predominating Caucasian blood, was mixed with Mongolian, but
his successors for several centuries after were mainly Caucasians or the
children of Caucasian mothers. Finally, the last and the greatest of
these terrible conquerors, Tamerlane, in the sixteenth century, made a
conquest of nearly the whole of Asia, penetrating even into Africa and
conquering Egypt, while his defeat of Bajazet, the Emperor of the Turks,
then at the zenith of their power, opened Europe to the march of his
desolating hordes, and could his life have been extended a few years
longer, it is quite possible that he would have accomplished what seems
to have been the object of Attila, and subjected the European as well as
the Asiatic world to his terrible sway. As it was, he invaded and
conquered India as well as Egypt, and the master of, or wearer of
twenty-eight crowns, he reigned over the whole of Asia to the borders of
China, except the Turkish dominions, and even here he was the recognized
master though he gave back the empire to the sons of Bajazet. The
character of his conquests—the death and desolation that marked his
path—was the most terrible as well as the most extensive ever witnessed
before or since, and many of the largest and most powerful empires of
Asia were as utterly blotted from the earth as if it had opened and
swallowed them up. He himself was of pure Caucasian extraction, and
doubtless his generals and chiefs were the same, and the Caucasian
Tartars formed a very considerable portion of his forces. There was
doubtless also a large mixed or mongrel element, for of the throngs of
female captives taken in these Mongolian invasions, few ever returned to
their homes, but becoming the wives of Mongolian chiefs, those numerous
and often powerful dynasties which have ruled over the Asiatic
populations had their origin. Nevertheless a vast majority of these
almost countless hordes led by Tamerlane were unmixed Mongolian, and,
therefore, though the leader was himself a Caucasian or white man, the
bloody and desolating character of his conquests were stamped by the
cruelty and ferocity of that race. Perhaps no better illustration of the
Caucasian and Mongolian character could be presented than the contrast
between Alexander’s invasion of Persia and India and similar invasions
of Tamerlane. The first, though a “Pagan” several centuries before the
Christian era, was humane and merciful to the conquered, and except in
battle shed no blood, while the latter not content with the enforcement
of the Moslem rule of tribute or death or the religion of the Prophet,
slaughtered whole populations after the battle was over, and for the
gratification of his ferocious hordes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account