Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
His conquest of Bagdad and his
pyramid of ninety thousand heads is one of those terrible things that
historians are generally puzzled with, for not only is there nothing
resembling it in history, but there seems to be no motive or sufficient
cause for it. It was the result, the offspring of Mongol ferocity and
apathetic cruelty, such as we now witness in India and China, and
springs as much, perhaps, from a low grade of sensibility or incapacity
to feel or sympathize with suffering, as from a sentiment of cruelty.
The Hindoos or East Indians, like the Chinese, also pretend to trace
back their history to a time long anterior to our own historic era.
Their claim, in this respect, is doubtless better founded than that of
the former, but it, too, is absurd and valueless. The Hindoos were
originally Caucasian, who, at some remote period, invaded and conquered
India, and stamped their civilization and religion on the whole
peninsula. It is quite likely, indeed it is certain, that India had been
invaded and conquered by numerous nations or tribes of Caucasians long
anterior to the Hindoo conquest. There are in our day too many traces of
this, too many evidences of the former existence of the great master
race of mankind in India, to permit us to doubt. The vast debris spread
all over India, indeed the sixty or seventy dialects of Sanscrit proves
that India must have been long subject to the dominion of the Caucasian.
It is believed by many that _Hindoo Koosh_, or the high tableland of
Thibet, was the cradle of the race, and it is rational to suppose that
long anterior to our own historic era white men may have formed the
principal portion of the Indian population. They doubtless thus spread
themselves over the peninsula; or if that was the birth-place of the
Mongolian, then it is certain that restless and energetic Caucasian
tribes at a very early day invaded and conquered the country. Even now
there is a large Caucasian element in India. The Afghans are pure
Caucasian, while the Sikhs, the Rajpoots, and a large portion of the
people of Oude are doubtless of predominating Caucasian blood. That
caste which English writers have so much to say about, and the good
people of Exeter Hall desire so much to “abolish,” is, to a great
extent, mere mongrelism, and that which is not mongrelism is simply what
England itself suffers from to a greater extent than any other country
or people. The Normans invaded the latter country, took possession of
their lands, and reduced the conquered Anglo-Saxons to slavery, where
they have remained, ever since, and though the Norman blood has long
since disappeared, the theory or system remains, for a few cunning and
adroit “Anglo-Saxons,” claiming to be the descendants of Norman
Conquerors, _now_ monopolize the land and rule the great body of the
people as absolutely as the real Normans did in their day. The early
invaders of India grasped everything, as did the Normans in England, but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account