Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
In the Mongol, Malay, or Indian, as well as the Negro, it remains the
same through all the stages of life, and it is only in extreme old age
that it becomes gray or silvery white, or even falls off from any
portion of the head. The coarse, stiff, black hair of the Indian child
is that also of its parents—and a gray-headed or bald-headed Indian,
except in some cases of extreme old age, is as rare perhaps as that of a
bald-headed negro. But the child of the Caucasian, with perfectly white
or flaxen hair, expands into the maiden with clustering ringlets of
auburn or perhaps raven black, to be threaded with silver, in middle
life perhaps, and though less common than with the other sex, a few
years later it becomes again, as in early childhood, perfectly white.
But there are no exceptions to the uniform color of the hair in other
races. Such a thing as a flaxen-haired or a light-haired negro child
never existed. There may be sometimes a slight approximation in this
respect among Mongols, but the hair of the negro, except in some cases
of extreme old age, remains absolutely the same at all periods, from the
cradle to the grave. The elementary structure as shown by the elaborate
microscopical observations of Mr. Peter A. Browne, of Philadelphia,
differs as widely as the external or superficial modifications. The
popular notion that it is wool instead of hair that covers the negro
head is like many others, founded on a mere external resemblance,
without any actual correspondence. It is hair, but _sui generis_, or
rather specific and common to the negro alone, and however widely
different from that of white people, it is no more so than any other
quality or feature of the negro nature. The variations of this feature
in the white race are almost unlimited. Hair dressing even has been
elevated to the respectability of an art, if not to the dignity of a
science. For many generations the kings of France kept _artistes_ of
this character, who often received a salary equal to the ministers of
the crown, and one of them, Oliver Le Dain, became in fact, if not in
form, the actual ruler of the kingdom. But it was the princesses and
ladies of the court that exalted this “art” to its highest pitch of
extravagance and display. Marie Antoinette—one of the most unhappy women
that ever lived—made it an important part of every day’s employment, and
exacted the same labor from her attendants. Even in our own more
sensible times, the Empress Eugenie changes the fashions in this respect
almost every month, and the styles or modes of dressing their hair is an
extravagant though amiable weakness of our own fair countrywomen. There
is in fact no mere physical quality of the female so attractive, or that
is capable of being rendered so charming, as the hair, and the elaborate
dressings, the time and labor spent on its decoration, proceed as much
perhaps from that delicate perception of the beautiful innate in woman
as it does from female vanity or the love of display.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account