Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
All the generic and specific forms of life are governed by their own
peculiar laws of interunion, and hybridism or hybridity is therefore a
phenomenon of varying character, having, it is true, certain
resemblances in those instances which approach each other, but
absolutely different in all cases. Naturalists have sometimes made great
blunders in this respect, for they have assumed that hybridism was
governed by the same laws in all cases, and therefore sought its
application or inferred its presence in instances the most remote and
contradictory. The most extraordinary, and, indeed, inexcusable instance
of the kind has been seen in the efforts made to confound the
distinctions of race, and to pervert truth into the most shameful and
what would seem to be the most palpable falsehoods. It has been assumed
by naturalists of high character that different genera never produce
offspring, that the _offspring_ of different species are incapable of
reproduction, and that varieties are unlimited in their powers of
virility. If, therefore, there were doubt in respect to the character of
certain (supposed) genera, and it was found that offspring followed a
conjunction of sexes, in this particular instance, it was inferred that
they were merely different species. And if the product or progeny of
these _species_ were found to be equally virile, then it was inferred
that they were all originally of the same species, and nothing but
varieties. This test, so simple that it can hardly be mistaken, serves
with sufficient accuracy to determine the real character, and when the
naturalist properly applies the laws of hybridity, that is, admits a
modification of these laws in all cases or in all the different genera
subjected to his examination, then he is armed with sufficient data to
render his labors accurate and effective. But however pains-taking or
correct in other particulars, when he assumes that hybridity is a unit,
and rigidly applies this in all cases, or to families widely remote in
other respects, his labors, from this defect, must be comparatively
valueless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account