Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
The instance already referred to, where hybridity was thus presented,
was as follows:—The mule, as is well-known, is the offspring of the
horse and ass. It does not, in its turn, reproduce itself, therefore the
horse and ass were different species. Prichard and others applied this
test, or marked this test, in the case of human beings, of whites and
negroes, and proved by it that they were of the same species. It was
seen that white men cohabited with negro women, and the offspring in
turn, reproduced itself, and consequently that the parents were of the
same species. Or, as this has passed as current coin hitherto, and
seemed perfectly satisfactory, indeed wholly unanswerable to naturalists
and men of science as well as others, it is best, perhaps, to place it
in distinct and categorical terms before the reader. 1st. It is
universally admitted by naturalists that incapacity in the offspring to
reproduce itself demonstrates the different species of the progenitors,
while, on the contrary, a capacity in the offspring to beget offspring
in its turn demonstrates similarity of species in the progenitors. 2d.
The mule, or the offspring of the horse and ass, does not reproduce
itself, therefore the horse and ass are different species. 3d. The
mulatto offspring of the white man and negro woman does beget offspring,
therefore the white man and negro woman are of the same species.
This was the assumption and the reasoning of Prichard and other European
ethnologists, and if hybridity were a unit, or principle of rigid and
uniform character in all cases, in human beings as in animals and
vegetables, in the case of the white man and negress, exactly as in that
of the horse and ass—then, indeed, would the inference seem unavoidable
that whites and negroes constituted in fact a single species. But they
were guilty of two fundamental errors in this matter—an error of fact,
and an error of reasoning, or perhaps it would be more correct to say
that both were errors of fact. At all events, _facts_ that demonstrate
difference of species in whites and negroes beyond possibility of doubt
were distorted into proofs which seemed to demonstrate sameness or
similarity of species with equal certainty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account