Neurosyphilis : $b Modern systematic diagnosis and treatment presented in one hundred and thirty-seven case historiesSouthard, Elmer Ernest
Science
Neurosyphilis : $b Modern systematic diagnosis and treatment presented in one hundred and thirty-seven case histories
Southard, Elmer Ernest
Neurosyphilis
It is clear that the brain was not wholly normal, exhibiting a general
induration due in part to subpial gliosis and in part doubtless to
perivascular gliosis. =Microscopically= the tissues showed features of
great interest, especially multiple focal neuroglia cell proliferations
of a perivascular distribution, considerable subpial fibrillar gliosis
of an unusually focal type, and a rather general subpial cellular
=gliosis=. Histologically, it seemed that this chronic progressive
process had started, not so much in relation with dying nerve cells, as
in relation with blood vessels. The =perivascular= deposits of neuroglia
cells were confined almost exclusively to the infragranular cortex
layers. It seems plain that the diagnosis of general paresis was not
justified. It is probable that the diagnosis of neurosyphilis is not
justified. The explanation may be that now and then cases of cerebral
sclerosis may clinically imitate the neurosyphilitic process. It must be
borne in mind that the diagnosis in this case was made, like the other
cases at head of Part III, without the advantage of modern systematic
methods. Clinically speaking, of course, there was no definite
Argyll-Robertson pupil, although the consensual reaction, slight on the
left side, was absent in the right pupil. The general picture appeared
to be one of the so-called demented form of paretic neurosyphilis.
=Differential diagnosis between NEUROSYPHILIS and NEURASTHENIA.=
=Case 45.= Albert Robinson, a man of 28 years, was shipwrecked on one of
the Great Lakes. The ship was on the rocks for eight days, and Robinson
was under a great strain. Ever after the wreck, Robinson had felt severe
pain in the head, neck, and back, and a feeling of great weakness
whenever he exerted himself physically or mentally, and seven months
after the wreck, he had several attacks of fainting.
For a number of weeks he had worried a good deal about his inability to
make money, especially as money was badly needed on account of his
wife’s approaching confinement. A few days before entrance, Robinson had
become very forgetful, and was unable to recall, the night before
entrance, where he had been during the day. On the whole, however, on
mental examination no actual evidence of memory defect could be shown to
exist.
=Physically=, Robinson was entirely negative, except for some hard
glands in each groin. =Mentally=, there was little to show except
depression, worry over his financial condition, and his inability to
work. The serum W. R. proved negative.
=Diagnosis=: On the whole, the diagnosis of psychoneurosis (see case
Harrison (9)) due to the shock at the time of the shipwreck seemed to be
proper. To be sure, the patient gave a history of a chancre at 25,
treated for two years, after which he was declared cured.
However, following up the clue of admitted syphilis, rigorous
questioning elicited the fact that a few months before there had been
diplopia, lasting part of a day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account