They carried with them coffee, fish, flour, provisions, tobacco, rum, iron, cattle, horses; they brought back molasses, sugar, wine, indigo, pepper, salt, muslins, calicoes, silks, hemp, duck. The situation is dealt with in detail by Bishop, _History of American Manufactures_, vol. ii, pp. 13–82; Clark, _History of Manufactures in the United States_, pp. 227 _et seq._; Weeden, _Economic and Social History of New England_, vol. ii, pp. 816–857. [40] Winsor, _The Memorial History of Boston_, vol. iii, pp. 191, 203; Morse, _The Federalist Party in Massachusetts_, pp. 37, 38; _Harvard Theological Review_, January, 1916, p. 104. [41] Weeden, _Early Life in Rhode Island_, pp. 357 _et seq._, calls attention to the spacious and elegant houses which were built at Providence about 1790, and to the new group of merchants which the expansion of trans-oceanic commerce called into existence there. Weeden, _Economic and Social History of New England_, pp. 821 _et seq._, deals with the situation in a larger way. [42] Parker, _History of the Second Church of Christ in Hartford_, p. 172. The passage contains a vivid picture of the state of polite society in an important Connecticut center. Love, _The Colonial History of Hartford_, pp. 244 _et seq._, deals with the transformation of social life with particular reference to the disintegration of Puritanism. [43] An outcry against the excesses of fashion began to make itself heard. “An Old Farmer,” writing to the _Massachusetts Spy_, March 27, 1799, complains on account of the consequent drain upon the purses of husbands and fathers: “I am a plain farmer, and therefore beg leave to trouble you with a little plain language. By the dint of industry, and application to agricultural concerns, I have, till lately, made out to keep square with the world. But the late scarcity of money, together with the extravagance of fashions have nearly ruined me.... I am by no means tenacious of the _old way_, or of _old fashions_. I know that my family must dress different from what I used to when I was young; yet as I have the interest of husbands and fathers at heart, I wish there might be some reformation in the present mode of female dress.... In better times, six or seven yards of Calico would serve to make a gown; but now fourteen yards are scarcely sufficient. I do not perceive that women grow any larger now than formerly.... A few years since, my daughters were not too proud to wear good calfskin shoes; two pair of which would last them a year: But now none will suit them but morroco, and these must be of the slenderest kind.... Young ladies used to be contented with wearing nothing on their heads but what Nature gave them.... But now they dare not appear in company, unless they have half a bushel of gauze, and other stuff, stuck on their heads”. The letter closes with a humorous account of the writer’s embarrassing experience with the trains of the ladies’ dresses on the occasion of a recent visit to church.