We have no doubt whatever that Sir George B. Airy and his assistants satisfied themselves that the pendulum at the bottom of the mine gained 2-1/4 seconds in twenty-four hours over the one at the top, but they may have been deceived by their over-enthusiastic adoption of what seemed to be a very grandly scientific theory, or by some unperceived changes in the temperature in the pendulums, caused by varying ventilation in the mine or the varying weather outside of it, or by the insidious manifestations of the "sympathetic electric control between clocks at the top and bottom of a mine," called in to assist at the experiments. An error of 1/38,400th part of the time the sympathetic electricity would take to travel from the top to the bottom of the shaft would be sufficient to make the experiments of no value whatever; not to speak of the small errors that may have been made in surveying the surrounding country, calculating the specific gravities of the strata--for we are told that all this had to be done-and applying the elements thus obtained to the solution of the problem they had in hand. We have read of the difficulties met with by Mr. Francis Baily when he began to revise the Cavendish Experiment--some twelve or fifteen years before the final Harton Colliery experiments were made, and suppose it possible that they met with similar difficulties without being aware of it. And 1/38,400th part is such a very small fractional difference in the vibrations in twenty-four hours, of the pendulums of the two separate clocks, that--taking into consideration the circumstances under which it was found--it would hardly be looked upon as reliable at the present day, when the clocks of astronomical observatories are placed in the deepest cellars or even caves available, so as to free them as much as possible from variations of temperature. Having referred to the difficulties met with by Mr. Baily, we believe it worth while to transcribe Professor C. Piazzi Smythe's account of them, given in his work already referred to at page 22; because it not only has a very direct bearing on what we have been saying of changes of temperature, but is exceedingly interesting, and probably very rarely to be met with in other works. It is as follows:-- "Nearly forty years after Cavendish's great work, his experiment was repeated by Professor Reich of Freyberg, in Saxony, with a result of 5·44; and then came the grander repetition of the late Mr. Francis Baily, representing therein the Royal Astronomical Society, and, in fact, the British Government and the British Nation. "With exquisite care did that well-versed and methodical observer proceed to his task, and yet his observations did not prosper. "Week after week, and month after month, unceasing measures were recorded; but only to show that some disturbing element was at work, overpowering the attraction of the larger on the smaller balls. "What could it be?