New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
Germany has responded to this desire, but has been able to find no
suitable formula, and I am not aware that other Governments have
been more successful. The time when wars were made by Cabinets is
past. The feelings which here in Europe may lead to war lie
elsewhere.
They have their roots in antagonisms which must be found in popular
sentiment. Everybody knows how easily this sentiment is influenced
and how, unfortunately, in many cases, it abandons itself
helplessly to irresponsible press agitations. A counterpoise to
all such and similar influences can but be desired. I shall be the
first to welcome it whenever international efforts succeed in
creating such a counterpoise.
But if I am to take practical steps and am to propose mutual
disarmament to the other powers, then general pacific assurances
and adjurations are not enough. With Germany there is no need for
such assurances or adjurations, in view of her constant policy
throughout forty years, which shows that we seek no quarrels in the
world. I should have to submit a fixed, definite programme. Then I
should have to consider in all sobriety whether such a programme
could be drawn up and carried out. Any one who makes uncertain and
vague proposals can easily become a disturber of the peace rather
than a peacemaker.
I shall have to decline to draw up such a formula and submit it to
an international congress.
England's Naval Police.
England is convinced, and has repeatedly declared, in spite of her
desires for the limitation of expenditure on armaments and for the
adjustment of any disputes that may arise by arbitral procedure,
that her fleet must in all circumstances be superior, or at any
rate equal, to any possible combination in the world. England has a
perfect right to strive for such a state of things, and, precisely
because of the position that I take up toward the disarmament
question, I am the last to cast doubts upon it. It is quite another
thing, however, to make such a claim the basis of a convention
which must be recognized by all the other powers in peaceful
agreement. What if counterclaims are raised and the other powers
are not satisfied with the roles assigned to them?
One only requires to propound these questions in order to see
things would not go well for European dignity at any world congress
which had to decide upon such claims.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account