New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915Various
History
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
Although the die was cast and Italy's decision taken, he had
the Austrian concessions greatly amplified, and he offered
them, _not to the King's Government_, but to Giolitti, his
secret ally, who was not in office, but was known to be the
Dictator of Italy. And Giolitti accepted them on the
condition, to be fulfilled after the Cabinet's fall, that
the territory would be further enlarged and consigned to
Italy before the end of the war. The increase of prestige
which this concession would bestow on the tribune was to be
his reward for co-operation with the German Ambassador.
Giolitti having thus approved the offer, undertook to have
it ratified by Parliament, _in spite of the engagements
which the Cabinet had already entered into with the Allied
Powers_. In this sense he spoke to the King, wrote a letter
designed for the nation, and obtained the public adhesion of
a majority of the Chamber which was not then sitting.
Thereupon the Cabinet resigned and left the destinies of
Italy in the hands of the King and the nation. On the part
of the Cabinet this was a brilliant tactical move and a
further proof of the praiseworthy moral courage which it had
displayed throughout the crisis. Indeed, the firmness,
perseverance, and dignified disregard of mild invective and
more deliberate criticism manifested by Sonnino and
Salandra, entitle these Ministers to the lasting gratitude
of their country. For it should be borne in mind that they
had against them not only the Senate, the Chamber, a section
of the Press, the "cream" of the aristocracy, the puny sons
and daughters of the leaders of the Risorgimento, but also,
strange to say, the majority of Italian diplomatists in the
capitals of the Great Powers, one of whom actually fell ill
at the thought that Italy was about to fight shoulder to
shoulder with the State to which he was accredited. It would
be interesting to psychologists to learn how this
diplomatist and one or two of his colleagues felt when a few
days later they were serenaded by enthusiastic crowds whom
they were constrained to address.
Are the Allies Winning?
In a Doubting Thomas article headed "Are We Winning?" the anonymous
"Outis" in The Fortnightly Review concludes that "the Allies are
winning, but very slowly. If their conquest is to be assured, Great
Britain's task is to mobilize every soldier and every workman, in
order to prove that whoever may fail, she at least does not intend to
desist until the final triumph is won." Moreover, the conquest must be
in the West "if anywhere," and he looks somewhat askance at the
Dardanelles adventure:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account