New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915Various
History
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
A good many competent authorities have disliked the idea of
the Dardanelles expedition, on the strength of a general
principle applicable to all military operations. It is said
that in every war there is one distinct objective, and that
that should never be neglected for any subsidiary
operations. Thus, in the present instance, our main effort
is to drive the Germans out of France and Belgium, and then
to attack them in their own territory. Anything which
interferes with this or throws it, however temporarily, into
the background, is held to be unwise, because it leads to
the most dangerous of results in warfare--the dissipation of
forces, which, if united, would win the desired success, but
if disunited will probably fail. Thus we are told that we
must not fritter away our energies in enterprises which,
however important in themselves, are not comparable with the
one unique preoccupation of our minds--the conquest of
Germany in Europe.
Selling Arms to the Allies
Horace White has no two opinions in his article in The North American
Review for July as to the wisdom and justice of the practice of
American manufacturers in selling munitions which the Allies are using
to kill their Germanic enemies. Mr. White expresses it as the belief
of the great majority of people in the United States that Germany's
war is without sufficient cause, and that when she invaded Belgium she
"made herself the outlaw of the nations--a country whom no agreements
can bind." Therefore he can see why no limit should ever be put to the
world's expenditure for armaments "while one incorrigible outlaw is at
large." He adds:
It is the opinion of most Americans that the most
incorrigible and dangerous outlaw and armed maniac now
existing is Germany, and that the first and indispensable
step toward a restriction of armaments and a quiet world is
to throttle and disarm her, and that no price is too great
to pay for such a consummation. Any result of the present
war which falls short of this will be the preliminary to a
new armament and another war on a wider scale than the
present one, since the United States will make preparations
for the next one and most probably take part in it.
Hence proceeds Mr. White's justification for this neutral nation's
supplying the Allies with arms:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account