New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918
Various
World War, 1914-1918
Agreements may be concluded during the war relating to common
action and common equipment, but having no connection with army
organization as such. We shall in no respect give up our right
of decision as regards economic rapprochement. Count Karolyi
continually talks about "Central Europe," but "Central Europe" is
a very vague idea. No one doubts that closer economic ties are
desirable and also possible. I repeat that we shall not give up in
a single respect our independent right of decision. The validity
of the economic agreement will depend on the approval of the
House. War aims were not discussed, for there can be no question
of war aims.
The entire alliance aims only at the maintenance of peace in all
directions. The alliance can but improve the mutual relations
between us allies, but it is not to be regarded in any way as a
hindrance to any eventual relations which may be established in
the economic domain with other nations; neither is it a hindrance
to an eventual entrance into the so-called League of Nations.
The guarantee lies in the fact that we have arranged a purely
defensive alliance.
ANDRASSY'S VIEWS
Count Julius Andrassy, one of the most influential statesmen of
Austria-Hungary, in a public statement discussed the new alliance
in detail. He asserted that when Bismarck and the elder Andrassy
were negotiating the treaty of alliance in 1879 the Iron Chancellor
expressed a wish that the two great powers should conclude a defensive
and offensive alliance against every eventuality. Andrassy, however,
was absolutely opposed to this, and, being convinced that the German
statesman would give way, was determined to break off the negotiations
altogether rather than conclude an alliance of such a general
character. His view prevailed, Count Julius added, and the treaty was
directed exclusively against Russia.
The treaty which was discussed by the two leading statesmen at Gastein
nearly forty years ago, and which has since then directed the events
of the world, has served its purpose so well, the Count continued,
that it has become superfluous in its old form. "It has smashed the
adversary against whom it provided protection." The treaty in its
new form, he asserted, is merely an adaptation of the original one
to altered conditions. In 1879, he stated, Russian Imperialism was
the only common danger for Austria-Hungary and Germany, and it was
appropriate therefore that the alliance should be directed against
Russia. Now, however, the situation is completely changed, and "the
danger against which we must protect ourselves is no longer Russian
imperialism but the permanent animosity of, and possible new attacks
by, those countries which have endeavored during the last four years,
while straining all their forces to the utmost capacity, to annihilate
the Central Powers and split them up into their component parts."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account