Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
COR. 16. Therefore if the figures of the orbits and their inclination
to each other be given, and the magnitudes, forces, and distances of
the bodies be any how changed, we may, from the errors and times of
those errors in[Pg 211] one case, collect very nearly the errors and times of
the errors in any other case. But this may be done more expeditiously
by the following method. The forces NM, ML, other things remaining
unaltered, are as the radius TP; and their periodical effects (by Cor.
2, Lem. X) are as the forces and the square of the periodical time of
the body P conjunctly. These are the linear errors of the body P; and
hence the angular errors as they appear from the centre T (that is, the
motion of the apsides and of the nodes, and all the apparent errors as
to longitude and latitude) are in each revolution of the body P as the
square of the time of the revolution, very nearly. Let these ratios be
compounded with the ratios in Cor. 14, and in any system of bodies T,
P, S, where P revolves about T very near to it, and T revolves about S
at a great distance, the angular errors of the body P, observed from
the centre T, will be in each revolution of the body P as the square
of the periodical time of the body P directly, and the square of the
periodical time of the body T inversely. And therefore the mean motion
of the line of the apsides will be in a given ratio to the mean motion
of the nodes; and both those motions will be as the periodical time
of the body P directly, and the square of the periodical time of the
body T inversely. The increase or diminution of the eccentricity and
inclination of the orbit PAB makes no sensible variation in the motions
of the apsides and nodes, unless that increase or diminution be very
great indeed.
COR. 17. Since the line LM becomes sometimes greater and sometimes less
than the radius PT, let the mean quantity of the force LM be expressed
by that radius PT; and then that mean force will be to the mean force
SK or SN (which may be also expressed by ST) as the length PT to the
length ST. But the mean force SN or ST, by which the body T is retained
in the orbit it describes about S, is to the force with which the body
P is retained in its orbit about T in a ratio compounded of the ratio
of the radius ST to the radius PT, and the duplicate ratio of the
periodical time of the body P about T to the periodical time of the
body T about S. And, ex æquo, the mean force LM is to the force
by which the body P is retained in its orbit about T (or by which the
same body P might revolve at the distance PT in the same periodical
time about any immovable point T) in the same duplicate ratio of the
periodical times. The periodical times therefore being given, together
with the distance PT, the mean force LM is also given; and that force
being given, there is given also the force MN, very nearly, by the
analogy of the lines PT and MN.
[Pg 212]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account