Nick Carter Stories No. 160, October 2, 1915: The Yellow Label; or, Nick Carter and the Society Looters.Carter, Nicholas (House name)
General
Nick Carter Stories No. 160, October 2, 1915: The Yellow Label; or, Nick Carter and the Society Looters.
Carter, Nicholas (House name)
Detective and mystery stories, American -- Periodicals; Popular literature -- Periodicals
“Nonsense!” cried his honor peevishly. “It says on the streets, not of
the streets. Somebody has been misleading you.”
“Not at all, your honor. I have seen the original copy of the ordinance
myself. I had occasion to examine it less than an hour ago, and I was
very particular to notice its exact wording. If your honor will take the
trouble to inspect the original draft of the ordinance--the one which
was signed by the mayor--you will find that I am right.”
“If such is the case,” Mayor Henkle broke in, with a scowl, “it is
merely a typographical error. Everybody knows that it was the intention
of the framers of the ordinance to regulate the taking of photographs on
the streets of Oldham.”
“I am willing to concede that, sir,” counsel for the defense replied
smilingly. “But, fortunately for my client, intentions don’t count. The
use of the word of, instead of on, may be a typographical error, but the
law must be interpreted precisely as it reads. It isn’t by any means the
first time that a typographical error has saved a man from jail. I have
known cases where even a misplaced comma has had that result.”
Then he turned once more to the magistrate. “I repeat my motion, your
honor, that this case be dismissed. Since none of these snapshots which
my client is accused of taking--and which he admits having taken--is a
photograph of the streets of Oldham, he is guilty of no violation of the
law.”
The magistrate frowned. “We will adjourn court while we go and inspect
the original draft of the ordinance,” he announced. Then, turning to the
Honorable Martin Henkle, he whispered to that discomfited official’s
ear: “If this typographical error really does exist, Mr. Mayor, I am
afraid that we will have to throw the case out of court. As this lawyer
has said, the accused is entitled to a strict interpretation of the law.
If I decided otherwise, they would go to a higher court.”
Once more the Camera Chap’s phenomenal luck, which never seemed to
desert him when he was in tight places, had come to his rescue. The
carelessness of a typist in striking the letter “f” instead of the
letter “n,” and the fact that the mayor had put his signature and seal
to the document without noticing the error, enabled him to leave court,
half an hour later, a free man.
But Hawley did not give all the credit to his lucky star. When the
magistrate, returning from the vaults in which the original drafts of
Oldham’s ordinances were preserved, very ungraciously granted Lawyer
Hands’ motion that the case be dismissed, the Camera Chap turned to his
counsel with a grateful smile.
“I owe my liberty to you, sir,” he exclaimed. “I shan’t forget it in a
hurry. How on earth did you happen to guess that you would find that
mistake in the wording of the law?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account