Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentaryNicolaus, of Damascus
History
Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentary
Nicolaus, of Damascus
Augustus, Emperor of Rome, 63 B.C.-14 A.D.; Emperors -- Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[68] ‘The state’ at this stage of events was, of course, by no
means unreservedly ‘on his side’, as Nicolaus says. In point of
fact, as we learn from Cicero’s letters, very few men at Rome
concerned themselves at this time about Octavian because of his
youth, Nicolaus is valuable here because he draws upon Octavian’s
memoirs and reveals how early Octavian matured his plans to
become Caesar’s successor in power as well as property. The
attitude of the consul Antony is well known (see Suet., Aug., 10;
Plut., Ant. 16). Octavian felt that the influence of Cicero was
worth cultivating, and hence while staying with his step-father
at the villa adjacent to that of Cicero at Puteoli, during the
latter part of April, made the most of every opportunity to
ingratiate himself with Cicero: ‘nobiscum hic perhonorifice et
peramice Octavius;’ ‘Octavius ... mihi totus deditus.’ (Cic.,
Att., 14, 11, 2; 14, 12, 2). Before the middle of May, the
tribune L. Antonius presented Octavius to the people as Caesar’s
heir (Cic., Att., 14, 20, 5; 14, 21, 4; 15, 2, 3).
[69] See App. 3, 10; 13; 14; Suet., Aug., 8; Vell. 2, 60, 1.
[70] ‘The name’ assumed by Octavius was not C. Julius Caesar
Octavianus as one would expect but C. Julius C. f. Caesar (App.
3, 11; Dio 45, 3). Only his immediate following, however, called
him Caesar; Cicero at this time called him Octavianus (Cic., Att.
14, 12, 2; 15, 12, 2; Fam. 16, 24, 2). In the decrees of the
senate reported in Cicero’s Philippics during the next year he
is referred to as C. Caesar C.f. pontifex (Cic., Phil., 5, 17);
this was after he had had his adoption legally ratified by a ‘lex
curiata’ (App. 3, 94). He had been striving toward this end for
some time, but had continually been prevented in his attempts by
Antony, who had, of course, always acted under the cover of a
subordinate official (Dio 45, 5, 3; 46, 47, 4).
[71] For the ‘money and means’ to which Octavian had access see
App. 3, 11; Dio 45, 3, who refer rather briefly to the matter.
[72] By ‘public property’ is meant the provincial tribute which
apparently went into the Aerarium Saturni. Caesar treated
military funds that accrued from booty as ‘his own’, and Octavian
apparently appropriated a part of this.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account