Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentaryNicolaus, of Damascus
History
Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentary
Nicolaus, of Damascus
Augustus, Emperor of Rome, 63 B.C.-14 A.D.; Emperors -- Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[144] These men seem to belong to the ‘middle group’ just
mentioned before the Lacuna. Nicolaus assumes that they are not
genuine friends of Octavian but egg him on against Antony for
purposes of their own. That they did so as Cicero certainly
did for the sake of preserving the constitution he neglects to
say. ‘Vibius’ is of course C. Vibius Pansa, one of the consuls
designated for 43, who though formerly a friend of Antony was
induced by Cicero to support the senate in view of his coming
consulship. He was friendly to Octavian but would hardly have
supported Octavian’s ambitions to the full. Lucius may well be
L. Julius Caesar, consul of 64 B.C., and Antony’s uncle; see
Pauly-Wiss. _Julius_ 145. He opposed his nephew Antony in 44 and
supported the senate, though he also tried to restrain the senate
from declaring open war on Antony in 43. We are not told what
his attitude toward Octavian was, but his opposition to Antony,
his frequent support of Cicero, his desire for peace, and his
friendship for conservatives like L. Piso, P. Servilius Vatia,
Servius Sulpicius, and Philippus make it probable that he favored
Octavian’s opposition of Antony without supporting Octavian’s
extreme ambitions. E. Schwartz (Hermes 33, p. 184) suggests that
L. Piso is here referred to. This is possible, but in view of the
fact that L. Julius Caesar was proscribed by the triumvirs in 43,
it is more likely that he is the one attacked by Nicolaus.
The Publius referred to is probably P. Servilius Vatia. He was
a man of little force of character, who half-heartedly supported
the senate against Antony in 44 and 43. The fact that Lucius
Caesar, against Cicero’s advice, nominated him in 43 as proconsul
to oppose Dolabella, proves that he belongs to the moderate group
which did not wish to offend Caesar’s soldiers or Octavian by
giving open support to Brutus and Cassius (Cic., Phil., 11, 19).
Brutus (Cic., ad Brut., 1, 16) as early as May, 43, took Cicero
to task for commending his own safety to Octavian; in ad Brut. 1,
17, 5, he alludes to the terms to which Octavian had come with
Cicero, in that the youth addressed the elder man as ‘pater’.
[145] Gallia Narbonensis (compare Dio 43, 51). Lepidus became
triumvir with Antony and Octavian in 43.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account