Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentaryNicolaus, of Damascus
History
Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentary
Nicolaus, of Damascus
Augustus, Emperor of Rome, 63 B.C.-14 A.D.; Emperors -- Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[146] See Cic., Phil., 5, 6; Fam. 10, 1, ff. Plancus had been
nominated consul for the year 42 by Caesar. He held Gallia
Comata under the provisions of the ‘lex Julia,’ concerning the
assignment of provinces. Antony endeavored to displace him
through the ‘lex tribunicia de provinciis,’ enacted in the early
part of June, 44, but his position was confirmed by a ‘senatus
consultum’ of December 20, which provided that the provincial
governors should retain their tenures until the senate itself
should appoint successors (Cic., Phil., 3, 38).
[147] Compare Dio 45, 10; App. 4, 84. Pollio was already in his
province when Caesar was murdered, according to his reference to
the Ides of March in Cic., Fam., 10, 31, 4.
[148] See App. 3, 2; Cic., Att., 14, 13, 2. D. Brutus had gone to
his province in April 44 B.C.
[149] Brutus’ official name was Q. Servilius Caepio after his
adoption by his uncle, though he continued to be called M. Junius
Brutus by his friends. ‘Gaius’ is probably an error of the
excerptor.
[150] For the year 44, the lawful praetor for Macedonia was Q.
Hortensius (Cic., Phil., 10, 11; 10, 13; 10, 26).
[151] Syria was under L. Staius Murcus, followed by Q. Marcius
Crispus (App. 3, 77) until the advent of Cassius (Dio 47, 27-28;
Cic., Fam., 12, 11, 1; 12, 12, 3). There is confusion among
the historians as to what provinces were actually assigned to
Brutus and Cassius for the year 43. Appian 3, 2; 3, 7-8; 3, 12;
3, 16; 3, 24; 3, 36; 4, 37, states that Brutus and Cassius were
appointed for Macedonia and Syria. Florus 2, 17, 4 says also that
Caesar had given them Macedonia and Syria. Plutarch, Caes., 57;
Ant. 14; Cic. 42; Brut. 19, as consistently state that Brutus and
Cassius received no provinces until after Caesar’s death; the
senate ultimately assigned Crete and ‘Libya’ (Plut., Brut., 19).
Dio 47, 21 explicitly states that Macedonia and Syria never were
given to Brutus and Cassius, but that Crete and Bithynia were.
Appian 3, 8 mentions Cyrenaica and Crete, and as an alternative
report, Cyrenaica and Crete for Cassius and Bithynia for Brutus.
The sequel is, of course, well known. Brutus and Cassius seized
Macedonia and Syria forcibly. W. Sternkopf, Hermes 47, pp.
340-347, has shown that the versions of Appian and Florus, that
Caesar had given Macedonia and Syria to Brutus and Cassius for
the year 43, are incorrect. Perhaps his most cogent point is that
Cicero nowhere condemns Antony and Dolabella for having diverted
from Brutus and Cassius provinces originally ordained for them.
In fact Cicero (Phil. 11, 27-30) endorses Brutus and Cassius
for having appropriated provinces which belonged, according to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account