Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
The reason of Tarquin’s being connected with Etruria was, besides
his name, the necessity of accounting for an Etruscan influence on
Rome. The Romans made Servius Tullius, who was an Etruscan, a Latin
from Corniculum; and _vice versa_, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, who
was a Latin, an Etruscan. Thus the whole story of his descent is a
fiction, and this is also decidedly the case with Tanaquil, inasmuch
as the Romans so name every one of the women who were stated to have
been Etruscans, it being a common Etruscan name, which is often met
with in inscriptions. In the old native tradition Tarquin was married
to a Latin woman, Caia Cæcilia, a name which must be traced back to
Cæculus the founder of Præneste. Her image was set up in the temple of
Semo Sancus; for she was worshipped as the guardian goddess of female
domestic virtue. This bears a genuine stamp of nationality. In the old
legend, she is such a familiar personage that the girdle of her brazen
image was filed off, and the filings were used as remedies.
It is therefore a matter of history, that there was a Latin Tarquinius
Priscus; yet he in all likelihood belongs to the Luceres. He introduces
the Luceres into the senate; to the two hundred councillors a hundred
more are added, summoned by the king as _gentes minores_ after the
_gentes_ of the two first tribes; in the rebellion of his son against
Servius Tullius, they are his faction. His time seems to be parted
from the former one by a great gulf: in his reign, Rome appears under
quite a different form from what she had before. The conquests which
are ascribed to Ancus Marcius are confined within a very narrow space.
He first conquers the mouth of the Tiber, and fortifies Ostia. But now
a state of things is mentioned, the consequences of which we still
see, even to this hour. To this very day there stands unchanged the
great river vault, the _Cloaca maxima_, with the name of which one
incorrectly associates a base meaning. It is not a mere sewer, though
it is also used as such. Its real object was no less than that of
draining the great branch of the river’s bed, which went forth from
the Tiber between the Capitoline, the Aventine, and the Palatine, and
between the Palatine and Capitoline, and then extended in marshes to
the space between the Quirinal and the Viminal, and of thereby gaining
solid ground. This work consisting of three half circles of huge blocks
of free stone without mortar, which even to this present moment have
not given way the breadth of the back of a knife, drew off the water
from the surface, received it under ground, carried it into the Tiber,
and formed a firm soil. At the same time, because the Tiber had also
muddy banks, a great wall was built as a dyke, the greater part of
which is still in preservation. This construction is equal in extent
and bulk to the pyramids; in difficulty it very far surpasses them. It
is such a gigantic fabric, that one does not comprehend it when one
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account