Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
The story is not altogether a fiction: Coriolanus lives too much in
the Roman legends for this to be the case. As for the assertion that
he was general of the Volscians, it is to be attributed to the natural
feeling that it is less painful to be conquered by one’s own countryman
than by a foreigner. From such a feeling of national pride, the Romans
gave a false colouring to the Volscian war, and thus softened down,
for themselves and the Latins, the disgrace of a defeat which led
to such great conquests of the Volscians. In the same spirit, they
devised the tale of the magnanimity of Coriolanus, and likewise of his
death; and I am convinced that Fabius Pictor was right in asserting
that Coriolanus, even to an advanced age, lived in exile among the
Volscians. That Rome was on the brink of utter ruin, is likely; the
distress, as represented, is perhaps not quite fictitious; but, that
the expedients for warding off the danger, namely, the three embassies,
of the senate, the priests, and the matrons, were invented to glorify
the hero, is not to be denied. The different orders in their narratives
mutually revile each other; and thus the _Plebes_ here shows itself at
once discouraged, and the patricians proud, as if they did not wish for
a reconciliation with Coriolanus.
I believe that the real truth is something quite different. At that
period when so many emigrants of the times of the Tarquins still
existed, who flocked together wherever a new gathering point presented
itself, I consider Coriolanus as one, who, on his retiring to the
Volscians, formed such a centre. As he finds an army of Roman emigrants
who are joined by the Volscians, he makes his appearance with them
on the Roman frontier. He could not, however, have had any idea of
forcing the walls of the city; but he encamped, just like a man in the
history of Dittmarsch who had renounced his country, and he threatened
war against it. He grants a respite, at first of thirty days, that the
senate might deliberate whether his demands were to be conceded or
no; and when this was not done, he waited for three days more, this
being the time which the state or the general asking for satisfaction,
still took to consider, whether war was to be declared, or how to
decide on any proposals which might have been made. Coriolanus had come
with partisans of the Tarquins, and likewise with many who had fled
the country for their crimes, and lastly with Volscians. The republic
invited him to return; the supplications of the mother, the wife, and
the matrons could have had no other meaning--but to urge him at least
to come alone, and not to bring back the terrible band. He probably
answered, that he could not enter alone, that he could not leave his
companions. If he returned, nothing remained for him but to be a tyrant
in his own native land, as we know from Greek history that the return
of the φυγάδες is an awful calamity; the ousted party cannot but crush
the other entirely.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account