Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
On his return from Rome, Eumenes was attacked by assassins in Delphi.
This plot may have been laid by Perseus; it was very like him, although
he positively disavowed it: perhaps also it was a farce of Eumenes
himself, intended to give the Romans a handle for war; yet it would,
after all, have been too bad. The demand of the Romans, that Perseus
should deliver up persons who stood highest in his estimation, because
they were accused of having been the instigators of that attack, met
with a flat refusal, and thence arose the war, which lasted until the
fourth year, from 581-584. This war took a different turn from what
the Romans had expected. They had hoped to be able to bring it to an
end, like the second Macedonian one and that against Antiochus, in
one campaign; besides which, they wished to crush Macedon, and to
reconstruct the whole state of things in the eastern countries. But
Perseus began the struggle with extraordinary resources: Macedon, for
the first time, had enjoyed a twenty-five years’ peace, and it was
thriving; so that besides his auxiliaries and four thousand horse,
he had an army of forty thousand foot. The last books of Livy are
mutilated, and thus we are without any clear view of part of the
operations. The duration of the war, considering the disproportion
between the two powers, is very great; but indeed the Roman generals
carried it on at first in the worst way that could be, and strategical
talent seems to have very much fallen off just then among the Romans.
P. Licinius Crassus appeared in Thessaly, where Perseus advanced to
meet him, and gained a pretty considerable advantage over his cavalry:
the Romans had many killed and taken prisoners. The king, in waging the
war, did it with the wish to obtain a favourable peace; and he believed
that by showing himself resolute, he would get it on better terms. Yet
this was contrary to the settled maxim of the Romans; in fact, it was
exactly a case in which they felt that they must humble him. Perseus
immediately began to negociate; but it was answered, that he was to
make his submission, and to await the decision of the senate. This led
to the battle in Thessaly, the result of which was favourable to the
king. This victory threw such lustre on the arms of Perseus, that the
whole of Greece was ready to go over to him. Yet the Romans had a vast
advantage in their fleet, which was a dreadful scourge to the Greek
sea-port towns; and though indeed it was now opposed by a Macedonian
squadron, which did more than any one expected, they had still the
best of it. Only some few party-leaders in Greece, such as Charops in
Epirus (who had been brought up in Rome, and made it his boast that
he was able to speak Latin), Lyciscus in Ætolia, and Callicrates in
Achaia, were for the Romans: the public opinion was altogether against
them. Whilst men like Polybius, who certainly hated the Romans as
bitterly as his father Lycortas did,--but this was a different hatred
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account