Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Fannius he was the first to mount the wall, he became a quæstor
and made the peace with Numantia. Its not being ratified greatly
exasperated him. Unfortunately, we have for this period only desultory
works from second or third hand, such as those of Appian and Plutarch:
the latter of these wrote the lives of the Gracchi with much feeling,
but without any knowledge of the true state of affairs, the moral part
in him, being, however, really beautiful; moreover, like Appian, he is
led astray by the gossip of any writer. Thus Plutarch allows himself
to be beguiled into the belief that the vanity of Tiberius had been
hurt by the repudiation of the peace; but of a soul such as that of
Tiberius, we may safely say that its motives for anger were different.
He had concluded the peace as an honest man, and to see it trampled
upon in defiance of all good faith, embittered him against the men who
then were in power. How a character like Gracchus in such times as
those must have felt bound to take in hand these dangerous πολιτεύματα,
may best be shown from the Servile war in Sicily, where the real canker
which lay at the root of the whole state of society is laid bare.
The _ager publicus_[65] was the land taken in war, of which the
ownership belonged to the commonwealth, but the possession was given
up to Roman citizens, or to foreigners, on the payment of certain
outgoings, such as the tithes on the produce of the arable land and
of the live stock; a _scriptura_ on the pasture land according to the
number of the cattle; and other things of the kind. By the Licinian
law[66] it had been enacted that no one should possess more than five
hundred _jugera_ of the _ager publicus_, but that he might transfer
the occupancy as if it were his property: yet the possessor was, after
all, only a precarious occupant, _a tenant at will_,[67] whom the real
owner might turn out, whenever he liked. If he possessed more than was
allowed by law, he was liable to punishment, and what was above the
quantity was to be confiscated: the state, however, might, of course,
at any time take back the whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account