Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
liberate one of the prisoners whom they had shut up in an exceedingly
narrow chest with the other, who was already dead. Now, both of these
learned critics say very rightly, that even if the Carthaginians had
really tortured Regulus, this had merely been done in retaliation;
and that moreover the accounts of his death are so very different.
According to some, he was blinded; according to others, tortured to
death in a chest stuck full of iron spikes; and again, according to
others, he was exposed to the sun and the insects. Some writers of
the middle ages, like the authors of the spurious _Acta Martyrum_,
felt quite a particular pleasure in devising the most horrible and
complicated tortures: this is also the case with the story of Regulus.
It is altogether a forgery; and Palmerius and Beaufort have just
grounds for their conclusion, that it was only invented to wash out the
foul stain of the tortures of the Carthaginian prisoners. I believe
that it has been borrowed from Nævius; for Diodorus does not know of
it, as is evident from his fragments: he had but a very imperfect
knowledge of Roman history, and only from the earlier, and almost
contemporary writers, Philinus of Agrigentum, Timæus, and Fabius
Pictor; the poet Nævius, he had not read. Thus it was very likely that
the latest Roman historians brought that tale into circulation from
Nævius. Cicero already is acquainted with the legend; it must have
therefore been either in Cato’s _Origines_ or in Nævius.[6] If it
originated with the later historians, it has arisen at least a hundred,
or a hundred and twenty years after the time of Regulus.
The Romans did not conclude the peace; in spite of their ill luck,
they were resolved upon going on with the war. The Carthaginians
now armed themselves with redoubled courage: they sent considerable
reinforcements to Sicily, and learnt how to make a right use of their
elephants; the Romans, on the other hand, became daunted, and withdrew
into the mountains. The Carthaginians wished to carry on the war
either by sea or by land: to do both at the same time, was more than
they could manage. The Romans then built a new fleet, took Panormus
(Palermo), and went again to Africa, and wasted the country between
Carthage and Tripolis; hereupon they returned to Sicily, the fleet
having had a wonderful escape in the small Syrtis. When bound for
Italy, they were again overtaken on the passage by a storm, and hardly
a vessel was saved.
The southern gales, every one of them from south-east to south-west,
are always in the Mediterranean the most dangerous storm-winds; and
they are the more destructive, as the Italian coast is almost without
any harbours, and full of breakers: the storms which blow from the
north are harmless. Yet when the currents from the Adriatic and the
Pontus meet, ships during a north easterly wind are irresistibly drawn
into the Syrtes (from σύρειν), so that they are in them before their
reckonings would lead one to suppose it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account