Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
little acquainted with them, and they cannot therefore but seem somewhat
unmeaning: in ancient times, however, such mythological subjects were as
much household words among the people as the Sacred History is with us.
Generally known events in modern history would now be perfectly well
suited to be dealt with by the artist. So long as in a nation there be
legends which every body is sure to sing and know by heart, there will
always be something which one may choose as one thinks good, and pick
out as the subject for an epic poem. Thus the epos makes choice of a
single part, whilst the cyclic poem, on the other hand, takes in a whole
series of tales. Such is the wretched Pharsalia of Lucan. Virgil took a
Latin story, and dove-tailed it into Greek legends; whereas had he
wanted to have anything out of the Roman legends, he ought to have
treated it in the Italian style: this might indeed have been very
difficult, as that kind of knowledge was no longer general; but it would
have been the only means of making a poem with much life in it. Virgil
is one of the remarkable instances of the way in which a man can miss
his true calling. His was lyric poetry. The little poem on the _Villa
Syronis_ and the _Si mihi susceptum fuerit decurrere munus_, show that
he would have been a poet like Catullus, had he not made the mistake of
wishing to write nothing but Grecian-Latin poems. It is a pity that
posterity so much overrated the very work which was but a failure; yet
we may well account for it, as people were not able to compare it with
Homer, whom they did not know at all, and its extraordinary beauties had
their full effect. Nor was the superiority of Catullus acknowledged
until the end of the eighteenth century. The first who spoke without
prejudice about Virgil, was Jeremy Markland: amidst a terrible outcry,
as if he had committed high treason, he openly said what he thought. It
was certainly no affectation that Virgil wished to burn the Æneid; that
poem was the task of his life, and he had in his last moments a feeling
that it was a failure. I am glad that he did not do so; but still we
must in all things learn to keep our judgment free, and even then we
cannot but love and honour him. It may be that the tomb on Posilipo,
which during the whole of the middle ages was already shown as that of
Virgil,—yet I know not why,—is not his, and that the laurel on it may
have been replanted many a time; but notwithstanding, I have gone to see
it as a pilgrim, and the laurel branches which I also plucked off at his
grave, are dear to me as relics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account